Mayoral musical chairs | The Observer | Roz Rogoff | |

Local Blogs

The Observer

By Roz Rogoff

About this blog: In January 2002 I started writing my own online "newspaper" titled "The San Ramon Observer." I reported on City Council meetings and other happenings in San Ramon. I tried to be objective in my coverage of meetings and events, and...  (More)

View all posts from Roz Rogoff

Mayoral musical chairs

Uploaded: Aug 21, 2011
There are two City elections in the Tri-Valley this year that feature termed-out Mayors changing chairs. San Ramon Mayor H. Abram Wilson and Livermore Mayor Marshall Kamena are both running for their City's Council seats because of maxed-out term limits on their Mayor's chair.

San Ramon voters passed Measure K, for the Direct Election of the Mayor, in 2001. The measure also limited the elected Mayor to four, two-year terms. H. Abram Wilson was the first and so far the only elected Mayor of San Ramon. Prior Mayors were appointed from the Council for one-year terms by a vote of the five Councilmembers.

This year Wilson filed to run for City Council since he cannot run again for Mayor. I interviewed him on Friday afternoon at the new Police Station building on Crow Canyon Road. Wilson's popularity isn't as high as it was in years past, so I asked him if the Council is out of touch with residents now.

Wilson said "the ones out of touch are the vocal minority," which he doesn't take very seriously. "Talk to anyone in San Ramon and they will tell you I'm accessible. They will talk to me in Safeway or Costco," he said.

I asked why he is running for City Council after being Mayor and how it could affect his political future if he lost. Wilson ran twice as the Republican candidate for State Assembly and lost. Wilson said he is not doing this for political gain but to maintain consistency on the City Council. "This isn't the time for amateurs," he said.

He described how San Ramon partners with Pleasanton, Livermore, and other neighboring cities to procure Federal funding for different projects by hiring one lobbyist for the entire Tri-Valley. "This is how we got $2M for the communications system," he explained, referring to the East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCSA), which links together all emergency responders in the East Bay except Oakland. "It's taken this long for me to work with other Mayors in the area. You can't do that overnight."

I asked him if he could accept the role of Councilmember after being Mayor for so long. He said he won't try to take over if elected to the City Council. "It will give me time to concentrate on endeavors that will help the City." He wants to focus on the downtown, legislation to help the City, and getting Dave Hudson onto ABAG and MTC (Metropolitan Transportation Commission).

I asked Wilson about Phil O'Loane, his principle outside opponent in the City Council race and why he didn't vote to reappoint Phil to the Planning Commission. Wilson told me he wanted to reappoint Phil, but Phil's interview for reappointment was the worst of the four applicants. "Someone who was Chair (O'Loane was Chair of the Planning Commission when he reapplied) should have knocked that (interview) out of the park."

I attended the interviews and it's true that Phil did not do as well in the interviews as the other candidates. I felt that the Planning Commission should be kept intact and the appointment shouldn't be based on the interview alone. Abram felt it wouldn't be fair to the others who came out for the interviews not to consider their interviews in making the decision. "It's not an old boy-old girl or anything like that," he said.

He's voted for people he disagrees with as long as they are doing a good job for the City. He voted to appoint Jim Blickenstaff to the General Plan Commission because he wanted diversity on the Commission. "If they are doing their jobs, they don't have to agree with me or like me, if I think they are the best candidate for the job."

"I value Phil as a person and business friendship," Wilson said, but he questioned Phil's knowledge of the planning requirements set by Sacramento. Wilson said he doesn't like the North Camino Ramon Specific Plan, ". . . but unless we have a plan we wouldn't get the money," from Sacramento. Wilson couldn't accept that Phil, as Chair of the Planning Commission, didn't understand that we needed this plan to apply for funding. "It was very difficult for me to vote against someone I supported at the beginning and unseat an incumbent," he explained.

I asked Wilson if he and Carol Rowley arranged to "swap seats," which Carol firmly denies, but she originally said she wasn't interested in running for Mayor. "People have a right to change their mind," he said about Carol's change of mind. "I respect her so much. You wouldn't want a politician who would never change their mind."

Wilson defended the performance of the current City Council, "If it's not broken, why are they trying to fix it in an environment like this?" He pointed out that San Ramon is the only city in the East Bay where property values have gone up and businesses are moving into Bishop Ranch. "We are the envy of so many cities around here," he declared.

Wilson, along with the other two Council candidates, Phil O'Loane and Scott Perkins, signed the voluntary pledge to keep his campaign expenses under $42,368. Wilson said that millions of dollars were spent against him in his last Assembly race. "That was the most expensive (Assembly) campaign in California history," he told me.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by Resident, a resident of San Ramon,
on Aug 23, 2011 at 9:38 am

Here's what the Contra Costa Times Editorial Board wrote about Wilson during his run for Assembly last year. If he is the "professional" then I say bring on the amateurs:
"Wilson, on the other hand, responds to questions with meandering, vacuous answers. He has no substantive ideas for fixing the state budget crisis. And the one key trait he once again offered up -- fiscal conservatism -- has turned out to be a big lie when it comes to his management in his own city.... The final straw for us was Wilson's insistence that "egregious" public employee pension spiking must be stopped. We certainly agree. Unfortunately, Wilson hasn't practiced what he preaches. The San Ramon mayor defends paying his city manager a jaw-dropping $344,200 a year, tops in the state, according to a new salary survey by the League of California Cities in which 90 percent of municipalities responded. Worse, Wilson seemed to have no idea how that exorbitant salary would inflate City Manager Herb Moniz's pension. Wilson was ignorant of basic details of the contract he personally signed as mayor. Our elected officials must be informed on the issues and lead by example. Wilson failed both tests."
Coco Times 10/24/10

Posted by kevin, a resident of San Ramon,
on Aug 24, 2011 at 4:16 pm

I'm not sure if I understand who the "Vocal Minority" are? Granted there is not a very big audience for the City Council meetings. A number of them, including my self over the past year, are regulars. A lot of what the City Council has wanted to do in the time I've attended, has been what I believe as out of touch with my desires. I guess I might be the vocal minority?

If you look at the Cities latest proposal: another 20% population increase, the North Camino Ramon Specific Plan, expansion into the Western Hills and desire to become trustees of the Tassajara Valley... the 72% of the residents answered vocally with a vote of no confidence.That was a "Vocal Majority"

I'm also confused about the comment of concern for amateurs running for the Council? Who is he talking about? Phil O'Loane, the past president of the Planning Commission? Bill Clarkson the head of the School Board?

Did he really say"If it not broke...". Yes, we have a tripe A credit rating, so did our country with a 14 trillion dollar debit. The City had to sell a bond to cover a 17 million dollar short fall in funding their City employees retirements because they did not see it coming? If the City has 50 million in reserves, why borrow 17 million that will ultimately cost 41 million? Are we really trying to raise money by rezoning 300 archers of our prime real estate for redevelopment dollars? Our recycle center stands vacant for 3 years because the City has ordained this site for low income housing.

I think the current City Council needs an infusion of new thinking, better cooperation with the public and amongst themselves and a review of our Cities financial status and direction.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,977 views

Community foundations want to help local journalism survive
By Tim Hunt | 20 comments | 1,660 views

Pop open the beer at the holiday table
By Deborah Grossman | 3 comments | 800 views