A is for Agenda | The Observer | Roz Rogoff | DanvilleSanRamon.com |

Local Blogs

The Observer

By Roz Rogoff

About this blog: In January 2002 I started writing my own online "newspaper" titled "The San Ramon Observer." I reported on City Council meetings and other happenings in San Ramon. I tried to be objective in my coverage of meetings and events, and...  (More)

View all posts from Roz Rogoff

A is for Agenda

Uploaded: Dec 8, 2011
Twenty years ago I wanted to be a mystery writer. I actually had the nerve to phone Sue Grafton (author of the Alphabet mysteries), and ask her for help getting my first book published. She gave me good advice on how to improve my writing, but I insisted my book was perfect. After receiving numerous rejection letters, I realized Sue Grafton was right.

Now I'm writing about the mystery of the San Ramon City Council Agenda. Fortunately no one gets murdered in it, but how items get onto the City Council Agenda is still a mystery to me. This is an old mystery that goes back at least as long as I've been making speeches in Public Comment at City Council meetings. That's about 10 years.

There's an instruction in the Agenda that Mayor Abram Wilson always read before Public Comment.

"Those wishing to have an item brought before the City Council for consideration must request so during a City Council meeting. Upon Council approval, the item will be placed on the Council Policy Committee Agenda for further consideration."

One of the mysteries in this instruction is how can the Council approve the item for the Policy Committee Agenda, if the item isn't on the Council Agenda? The Council cannot vote on or discuss an item that isn't on its published agenda unless it is an emergency. So if someone asks to have an item put onto an upcoming Council agenda, who approves it for the Policy Committee Agenda?

The Policy Committee is a subcommittee of the City Council. Subcommittees like this are made up of only two Council members. Because they are not a quorum and cannot vote on issues, subcommittee meetings are not covered by the Brown Act. Still the Policy Committee Agendas are posted on the City's website under Meetings and Notices .

Dave Hudson and Carol Rowley have been on the Policy Committee for the last several years. The Committee meets the fourth Wednesday of the month at 4 pm in the conference room at City Hall. I've attended several Policy Committee meetings over the last 10 years. I am usually the only resident there. While subcommittee meetings are open to the public, they are scheduled at a time when most people cannot attend.

The last Policy Committee meeting I attended was in July when the Committee discussed reactivation of the Open Space Committee and adding a resident to the committee. This was requested by Jim Gibbon in Public Comment at a previous City Council meeting. Councilmember Carol Rowley wanted to discuss it too.

I can't recall too many times when someone requests something in Public Comment and it actually goes to the Policy Committee. Maybe it does more often than I recall, but unless the requester is monitoring the Policy Committee Agendas every month, or calls the city for a follow up, they are not notified their item will be on the Policy Committee Agenda.

I personally have found that requesting something be put on an Agenda, or considered by the City Council, is like shouting into a dark cave. Nothing comes back, not even an echo.

It's not always clear what constitutes a request for Council consideration in Public Comment. Six years ago I asked the Council to consider switching our Animal Control from the Contra Costa County shelter in Martinez to the East County Animal Shelter (ECAS) in Dublin.

I did not hear back from the City Council about this request, but I heard from someone else. "I received an email from Bill Clarkson, who has also worked with animal rescue groups finding homes for dogs and cats. He wanted to know what we could do to change our Animal Control from Contra Costa County to our own city Animal Control." That's a quote from a commentary I wrote on my original San Ramon Observer website five years ago.

I later found out what happened to my request about ECAS. I was at a Chamber lunch sitting next to Sgt. Paul O'Mary. I asked him about San Ramon switching to Dublin for Animal Control and he told me Alameda Country has different Animal Control laws and fees from Contra Costa County, so we could not contract with them. If I hadn't asked Sgt. O'Mary this, I probably still wouldn't know why.

So what I'd like to propose at the next City Council meeting on December 13th, is to change the way items are requested for City Council consideration. In the first place it shouldn't be limited to asking in Public Comment at a Council Meeting. As we know, not everyone has time to attend City Council meetings and not everyone wants to speak in public. That should be one avenue for consideration by the Council, but an email, a letter, or even the City's Online Contact Us system should be available for this kind of Request.

One good feature of the Contact Us system is it creates a formal request ticket that goes to someone on Staff and requires follow up. When the City first introduced this system I asked that requests made in Public Comment be added to the Online Request system for follow up. So far they are not. All requests should be followed up, even if just to say, we looked into it and it cannot be done because of xyz.

If a request is put on a Policy Committee Agenda, the requester should be notified and invited to the Policy Committee meeting. Perhaps the meetings should be rescheduled to make it easier for requesters to attend them. At the very least the requester should be informed about the decision of the Committee, yea or nay, and given a reason why. Perhaps they could be given until the next Policy Committee meeting to appeal a rejection, or at least meet with a Councilmember or Staff on the reasons it was rejected and what the requester could do to the change the request to make it more acceptable.

The Council shouldn't have to waste time on a bunch of junky requests, but there should be a better way for residents who want something considered by the City Council to request it and know whether or not it is being considered and if not why not.
Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by Bob P., a resident of another community,
on Dec 9, 2011 at 12:05 pm

If a council member requests that something be placed on a future agenda, does that request need policy committee approval as well? I believe the reason for involving the policy committee in these decisions is to prevent frivolous agenda items?

Posted by Roz Rogoff, the San Ramon Observer,
on Dec 9, 2011 at 12:49 pm

Roz Rogoff is a registered user.


I believe even if a Council member requests it, it goes to the Policy Committee to give staff direction for the staff report. At least that's what happened in meetings I've attended. Maybe Dave Hudson can fill us in on the duties of the Policy Committee.


Posted by mloliver, a resident of San Ramon,
on Dec 9, 2011 at 2:35 pm

Council members are accessible members of the community by phone or email. If a resident desires something to come before the council, one effective way is to contact a council member and ask for their support in getting the item on a future agenda. It will still go to the policy committee, but that helps. As was mentioned, the council can't legally discuss anything that comes up on the public comment portion of the meeting. They can refer a problem to staff and have the person contact a staff member to solve the issue, or they can send it to the policy committee. Communication is a two way street and contact with an individual council member is one way to get the ball rolling.


Posted by Roz Rogoff, the San Ramon Observer,
on Dec 9, 2011 at 3:02 pm

Roz Rogoff is a registered user.

Thanks for the suggestion, ML. While it should be obvious that residents can contact their Councilmembers, many residents don't know that or don't feel their questions are welcome.

That was one of the issues in the last election. Many voters felt Bill Clarkson and Phil O'Loane would be more accessible than Abram Wilson or Carol Rowley. Even if that's a misconception, if residents feel more comfortable contacting Phil or Bill they are more likely to do it.


Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from DanvilleSanRamon.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 8 comments | 2,064 views

Reflecting on lives this Thanksgiving Day
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,073 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 227 views