Bush-league | Raucous Caucus | Tom Cushing | DanvilleSanRamon.com |

Local Blogs

Raucous Caucus

By Tom Cushing

E-mail Tom Cushing

About this blog: The Raucous Caucus shares the southpaw perspectives of this Boomer on the state of the nation, the world, and, sometimes, other stuff. I enjoy crafting it to keep current, and occasionally to rant on some issue I care about deeply...  (More)

View all posts from Tom Cushing


Uploaded: Aug 5, 2015

I wanted to like JEB! Bush. Honest. Granted, I considered him a 'reasonable' insurance policy against the possible election of some much worse GOP candidate, of which there are several. But word was spread (from SOMEwhere) that he was the smarter, saner Bush brother ? the one who'd been groomed by the family for the Presidency. Having observed him so far, I'm not convinced, or impressed.

Let's look at the following recent, remarkable quotes, in no particular order:

On Social Security: "We need to look over the horizon and begin to phase in, over an extended period of time, going from 65 to 68 or 70." (Face the Nation)

If he knew then what he knows now, would he invade Iraq? "Yes, I would. And so would Hillary Clinton." (Fox News)

On how he will achieve his promised 4% economic growth rate: "people are going to have to work longer hours." (NH The Union Leader interview)

On women's health: "I'm not sure we need (to spend) $half-a-billion for women's health issues" (Sn Baptist Convention event, yesterday)

It's not just that I disagree with every one of those statements as policy, it's that they betray also a startling ignorance of the actual state of things, for a man who would be Prez.

For instance, on Social Security, he's unaware that the current retirement age is already 66, not 65, and that people now in their mid-fifties will be subject to a retirement age of 67. Raising it to 70 would significantly reduce the benefits paid to workers now in their 40s ? whose wages are stagnant, and whose pensions have been gutted. And The Rich get richer.

Or let's examine the slow-pitch softball lobbed his way by Megyn Kelly on Fox, intended to elicit the obvious "no, but the intel was bad" response. So eager was he to attack Mrs. Clinton that he ignored the friendly question's premise, signed-on to repeat that disastrous policy debacle, and had to huffily backtrack about unfair hypotheticals. Huh? Hypos are the fairest of game in politics ? it's how we get insights into the candidates' likely future actions.*

JEB!'s was a distinctly unPresidential response ? say what you will (and you will) about the incumbent -- his words are generally careful, articulate, accurate and measured.

The "work longer hours" advice to John-and-Joanna Public suggests a patrician's blissful ignorance of conditions in the hustings. Is he really unaware that Americans, in their desperate, vain attempts to maintain a tenuous grip on middle-class circumstances, already work the world's longest hours ? far outstripping the industrious Japanese, Germans and every other labor force? 'Thank you, sir, may we have another hour?'

Further, is he not aware that his own record of economic "growth" in Florida was just a bubble of over-building, fueled by the chicanery of his friends on Wall Street? Alternatively, is that the kind of "growth" party we can expect from a Bush3 Administration ? one with a decade-long, Florida-sized hangover attached?

Finally, much the same can be said ? in spades -- of his current gaffe regarding women's healthcare spending. It was stated in the context of the GOP's slimily orchestrated attempt to defund Planned Parenthood, in the wake of 'revelations' about the organization's practices.** First, the statement is sloppy, as it tends to demean the interests of a voter demographic that is both huge and generally, already suspicious of GOP motivations. Gender canyon, anyone?

Second, it has the sound of a canned talking point that again implies a lack of depth on the topic. If I know that the federal government spends upwards of a $Trillion annually on health care ? let's assume about half on women's health-related expenses, why doesn't JEB! know it? That makes his $500M about ? scribble-scribble ? cancel/cancel/cancel ? all of 1% of what's already being spent for women's healthcare ? and he wants to eliminate that?

But let's give him the benefit of growing doubts and assume that he knows that the $500M=1% is paid to Planned Parenthood for services rendered. Does he not know that not-a-penny of that amount goes to fund abortions? -- or that all of 3% of PP's services relate to abortions, and it's ALL privately funded? -- or that the full $500M goes to contraception, anti-cancer (e.g. mammograms) and other services (STD testing/treatment) crucial to the health of low-income women and their families? Is that really what he wants to cut? Has he consulted with his wife on this subject?

These have not been isolated incidents involving trivial matters. They form a consistent pattern that models the out-of-touch, slow-afoot qualities of his sibling. So, thank you sir ? may we have another candidate?

* Yes, I AM aware that Mrs. Clinton also engaged in such a ploy recently regarding the Keystone Pipeline. That was equally egregious, although not quite so much in-character. She should not wonder about her 'untrustworthy' ratings as long as they are of her own making.

** do I think the organization made a very short-sighted blunder even donating fetal tissue for medical research? Yes. Are they merchants of baby parts? No. Is this the stuff of a whole 'nother blog? Yes.
Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 3:08 pm

I don't dislike Mr. Bush but he's certainly baffled this one when he casually said: Everything varies within a state of itself.


He was only asked to comment about the fluctuating prices of gas at the pump.

I think that his remark was about thinning commuter traffic...just sayin'


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 3:13 pm

the moore I thinks about it, i'm convinced he outta be asked about the donut's hair...he does, after all, have flair!

the donald could then reach right over and punch him in the snoot and all HE__ would break loose on stage...screaming everywhere...i mean it!


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 3:16 pm

do you read me?

Web Link

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 3:20 pm

he's reeeeeeeeel dum: Web Link

and look at its face...lopsided...


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 4:47 pm

My very last post: Hopefully, Megan Kelly will ask Gov. Bush how to spell

Posted by American, a resident of Danville,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 5:24 pm

Unlike Trump, when Governor Bush is " sloppy" with his words, he issues "clarifications"... Bush was speaking in reference to Planned Parenthood caught selling body parts, and obviously he is not against funding women health issues, as he clarified... No such clarification from Trump regarding his disgusting comment on Senator McCain, as he meant exactly what he said.

Bigger story is FBI now officially investigating Hillary over her "e-mail gate". As national polls have shown she is least honest and least trustworthy candidate. Governor Bush may have some " sloppy" comments that he clarified, and I would prefer " sloppy" words to an untrustworthy person( Hillary) or a mean spirited person who degraded all our POW's.( Trump)

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 5, 2015 at 7:12 pm

I doubt that Bush needs anyone to explain away what he really meant to say...publicly...it matters how others perceive Bush...he comes across as an ill equipped candidate that fellow Americans may not choose to risk supporting...how the world views international leaders depends greatly upon how well they represent their country's interests...Bush has earned a very low mark! He continuously fails to speak clearly, as if he doesn't understand the issues.

I look forward to the two investigations re: clinton and the donald. The comment re: McCain is past...give it a rest.

I'll make sure that as the election year moves along, I'll pay very close attention to my own slooooopy speech.

Posted by American, a resident of Danville,
on Aug 7, 2015 at 11:19 am

Governor Kasich was extremely impressive during the debate. I, like most Republicans not in Ohio, knew very little about him until yesterday. After doing some research on him, and watching the debate, I really think he would make a very good President. The son of a mailman, he is an extremely popular two term Governor of a key battleground state, and unlike Hillary he unifies people, which is badly needed right now.

Trump showed how "unpresidential" he was during the debate, and I think it is extremely likely his numbers in the polls will start dropping, and he will run as an independent.

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Aug 8, 2015 at 9:53 am

I agree the Gov. K is uniquely qualified to be elected as the President.

However, it's a long haul and I'm not eager to take sides or to take any polls seriously until about 1 or 2 months prior to the election.

Posted by Splendid, a resident of Deer Oaks/Twelve Oaks,
on Aug 8, 2015 at 3:10 pm

I thought Cholo was banned! What is this crap?!?

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of another community,
on Aug 8, 2015 at 6:19 pm

S -- not to my knowledge.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from DanvilleSanRamon.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 8 comments | 2,065 views

Reflecting on lives this Thanksgiving Day
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,073 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 231 views