The Toothbrush Rebellion | Raucous Caucus | Tom Cushing | |

Local Blogs

Raucous Caucus

By Tom Cushing

E-mail Tom Cushing

About this blog: The Raucous Caucus shares the southpaw perspectives of this Boomer on the state of the nation, the world, and, sometimes, other stuff. I enjoy crafting it to keep current, and occasionally to rant on some issue I care about deeply...  (More)

View all posts from Tom Cushing

The Toothbrush Rebellion

Uploaded: Jan 5, 2016

There’s an anarchic streak that runs through the American character. Perhaps we were self-selected for obstreperousness; many ancestries include folks who braved dire trans-Atlantic crossings to escape persecution and other impositions of religious or secular authority. This characteristic forms a theme in the nation’s unique history.

The prime example, of course, is the Civil War in which more of our fellow countrymen died than in all other organized conflicts, combined. The record is also dotted with other revolts against being told what to do, or pay, by somebody else – the more distant the worse.

The Whiskey Rebellion of 1791 is an early precedent. In it, western farmers revolted against the original ‘sin’ tax enacted to help pay-down public debt from the recently concluded revolution against the British Crown. Whiskey may have been a luxury to the Coasties, but on the frontier it was much more: a staple beverage, a high value-added commodity that could be transported much more easily than raw corn, and even a medium of exchange for goods and services. Thus, the unfairness of such a toll imposed by the eastern elites was evident to those who were to pay it.

So it was that early-day revenuers who tried to collect the levy were tarred-and-feathered, and a mob several-thousand strong laid siege to the tax collector’s headquarters. Shots were exchanged, somebody died, and federal militia were raised from other states to put down the insurrection. Indeed, ‘tis said that the troop deployment was an early passing test of federal power under the newly-drafted Constitution.

Viewed in that context, the current stand-off in eastern Oregon comes off as a kind of a weak sister. It is the latest example of a simmering disquiet that has its origins in the homesteading movement of the original westward expansion. There’s a lot of history there, but one upshot has been that the federal government owns and manages the majority of the real estate in many western states. Of course, depending on your view of things, that’s ownership by either We, the People – or by those pointy-headed DC bureaucrats at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM).

The local control movement has gone by various names, including the Sagebrush Rebellion of the 1970s and the current so-called Sovereign Citizens Brigade. There are strains of it in the Nevada-born Tea Party, and it had most recently reared its head in the 2014 Showdown at the Bundy Corral (still essentially unresolved). That dust-up can be variously characterized as either an upstanding defiance of remote BLM overlords, or the last stand of a deadbeat squatter who has embezzled over a $million in unpaid grazing fees from the rest of us.

The baseline claim is that these federal lands ought to be ceded to more immediate state authorities to be managed for the benefit of the local citizenry. Again, perspective matters: a rancher may look at a wildlife sanctuary and see an unproductive wasteland; others may see it as a vital way station for migratory birds, and a necessary refuge for other wild fauna in nature’s balance. Federal authorities, perhaps informed by previous, unrelated enforcement debacles at Waco and Ruby Ridge, have trod lightly lest they create martyrs from among the armed and aroused insurrectionists.

As sometimes happens (see Sarajevo, circa 1914), this year’s sparking incident and its newsworthy aftermath are quite distinct. A local protest against an arson conviction for fires that spread onto federal lands attracted a ragtag Army of the Unhappy from elsewhere in the west, including two of the Nevada Bundy Boys. In their righteous, if generalized rage, they determined to takeover … something. The Malheur National Wildlife Refuge was handy, unarmed and mostly unoccupied. They stormed it (no word on whether any animals were harmed in the making of their conquest), and have vowed to hold it ‘til the cattle come home.

It seems more likely that these particular weekend warriors will go home to their cattle, so that we might dub this The Toothbrush Rebellion. The feds have wisely not provoked them and the locals wish they’d leave – they appear at the moment of this writing to be rebels without a constituency.

Which is not to say that they are without a cause. The issue of the immediate vs. the collective is important, and, as above, all bound up in our concept of federalism. Who among us has not railed against authority at some point, when our degrees of personal discretion are limited by a spare-the-air day, a tax, a building code, an endangered species or a speed limit?

The rural west has not done well of-late, with lumbering in decline, commodities prices low and beef transitioning from ‘what’s for dinner’ to a growing public perception of an inhumane, vein-clogging, land-destroying, global-warming scourge of an industry. Those ‘compositional amenities’ of traditional western life are under anonymous attack, and somebody must be blamed.

Personally (you knew I’d get there), I do feel for the plight of our countrymen so battered. Something ought to be done, but The Market is unlikely to provide much help in the foreseeable future (“In the long run, we’re all dead” – Keynes), and it may be hard to convince those affected that government can be some part of their answer.

Moreover, there is a Bigger Picture to be seen here – important interests that all of us have, that may be less apparent to folks immediately impacted. I want wilderness, and wildlife sanctuaries, and just open spaces ‘unimproved’ by mankind. Nature is a global phenomenon, and its fundamental linkages far transcend the concept of local control. In fact, local control is no panacea, prone as it is to both corruptive and innocent forces representing short-term greed and human self-interest.

Given the choice, and admittedly less directly affected than the sagebrush clans, I will take the status quo. The Constitutional balance that worked in 1791 still makes sense today.

What is it worth to you?


Posted by rosalindr, a resident of San Ramon,
on Jan 5, 2016 at 12:05 pm

rosalindr is a registered user.

The BLM is not protecting wildlife. At least not according to the fundraising letters I get from wildlife organizations. Wolves, mustangs, bobcats, and other wild animals are either rounded up by the BLM and put into corrals to die of starvations, or hunted from helicopters. If the Government was actually doing more to protect wild animals on their lands, I'd be for them, but if they are as awful as the mail I've been receiving says they are, then I'm for giving the land back to the ranchers or to real animal protection organizations.


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Jan 5, 2016 at 2:50 pm

The comments may not bother you Roz but it appears to be bothering many of your readers/supporters. That matters.

I view the comments as Psychological Violence and not healthy for young folks or responsible adults to read.

I've sent multiple copies to 22 news sources, the Police, and to the State in Sacramento.

Please do not allow such violence to nurture the distorted fantasies of otherwise healthy Americans.

Yours is a public blog and if doesn't bother you it may be a way of supporting the emotional violence of another.

Please behave responsibly.

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of another community,
on Jan 7, 2016 at 6:44 am

A birder weighs-in: Web Link

"... to me this action seems much like many others in American history: a loudly proclaimed defense of principle intended to cover up a land grab.

And the land being grabbed? It’s ours." ...

"When land is held by the federal government they so despise, that land belongs to us all. You cannot “reclaim” territory for the “people” if they already own it. The seizure of Malheur is an attempt to claim the land, at the point of a gun, for unnamed individuals, all while taking it away from every other American. Whatever this action may be, it is not patriotism."

Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Jan 8, 2016 at 6:09 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

Obstreperousness or Fulminate!

This group is a gathering of people in order to fulminate. They are jumping up on the table waving their flag, proclaiming this is our land.

The reality is, the land they have proclaimed to belong to them was stolen from American aborigines.

Posted by BobB, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Jan 8, 2016 at 6:13 pm

"The reality is, the land they have proclaimed to belong to them was stolen from American aborigines."

And various tribes of American aborigines stole it from each other -- and from the native species of animals living there

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of another community,
on Jan 9, 2016 at 7:24 am

ONe of my favorite columnists chimes-in: Web Link including on the original ownership issue.

"The extremists, in Congress and the snows of Oregon, want to return to a 19th century world where blunt force — against Indians, wildlife, the public good — prevails. It’s a fantasy, costumed in western wear, except that the guns are real."

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Jan 9, 2016 at 8:26 am

Hopefully, the matter will be resolved soon.

It's important to avoid armed confrontation.

I strongly support preserving the land, allowing animals to roam/fly freely, and not allow construction. There are so few protected lands, keep American beautiful. Protect the homeland.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Community foundations want to help local journalism survive
By Tim Hunt | 20 comments | 1,673 views

I Do I Don't: How to build a better marriage Ch. 1, page 1
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,306 views

Pop open the beer at the holiday table
By Deborah Grossman | 3 comments | 821 views