News

San Ramon reviewing pair of proposed apartment complexes

One would see The Golden Skate torn down; second would be mixed-use facility just blocks away

The San Ramon Planning Commission on Tuesday is set to take an early look at design concepts for two apartment complexes proposed to sit a couple blocks apart on the northwest side of the city.

The first project calls for 227 units in a five-story building at 2701 Hooper Drive — home to The Golden Skate roller rink, which would be removed to accommodate the new apartments.

The second proposes a four-story, mixed-use complex with 200 apartments overall, along with retail spaces and residential amenities on the ground floor, at 2233 San Ramon Valley Blvd., replacing Morgan's Masonry Supply that currently exists at the site.

The separate proposals are early in the design phase, and Tuesday’s meeting is supposed to serve as initial screenings by the commission. City planning staff sees areas of concern with each proposal as currently presented.

“The value of the process is in the feedback provided by the Planning Commission and staff that allows the applicant to make informed decision regarding potential revisions to their project based on the comments received,” city senior planner Lauren Barr wrote in a staff report.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

The commissioners are not considering any approvals Tuesday night, but they are scheduled to discuss each concept in depth.

First on the agenda is the Golden Skate site, a 3.37-acre parcel owned by Hassan Sharifi and his Wildflower Fields, LLC.

Developer Bay Area Property Developers, LLC, proposes to build a 227-apartment complex that stands goes from three stories at one end up to five stories at the other, with two garage levels below ground.

The early proposal calls for a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom units.

The site is designated mixed-use and zoned residential overlay in the Crow Canyon Specific Plan (CCSP).

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

It would be eligible for up to 168 units based on its size, under city standards, so the applicant requests a 35% density bonus to increase the output to 227 apartments, Barr said. That move would allow the project to feature 20% affordable units for very-low-income households.

City staff thinks the current proposal is too large for the site, according to Barr.

Other areas of concern include the west side of the structure coming “very close” to an earthquake fault line, the connection to Hooper Drive, wall heights, stormwater compliance, landscaping and traffic, Barr said.

Staff recommends “a less intense project given the site conditions and constraints,” according to Barr, adding:

“Absent a project redesign, staff recommends that applicant revisit the project massing and utilize the materials and architecture to maximize compatibility with the surrounding area, minimize the monolithic nature of the project and consistent with the intent of the CCSP.”

The second project, located just up the road at 2233 San Ramon Valley Blvd., calls for a four-story complex consisting of 200 apartments, with 17,600 square feet of commercial space and about 10,000 square feet of resident amenities on the ground floor of the structure.

Owned by JSA Properties, Inc. and JAS 2233, LLC, the project site consists of two parcels totaling 2.98 acres and has frontage along Omega Road, Deerwood Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard. It is zoned and designated for mixed-use.

As proposed by developer Fore Property Co., the apartments would consist of a mix of studio, one- and two-bedroom units.

The site would be eligible for 149 apartment units based on its size, so the applicant proposes a density bonus of 35% to increase to 200 apartments overall and allow for 15% of the units to be affordable.

The ground-level residential amenities could include a gym, lounge area/cybercafe, business center, bike shop and storage lockers, according to Barr. The project would feature a parking garage with four and five levels.

The complex would not be continuous along San Ramon Valley Boulevard, having to wrap around Star Auto Services, whose parcel at 2401 San Ramon Valley Blvd. is not included in the project.

“The gap in the project frontage and required buffer between residential and commercial uses is by far the most difficult to resolve,” Barr said.

City staff thinks the project would be “far better served “by acquiring and integrating the automotive property,” according to Barr.

“While staff understands that the applicant cannot compel the sale of the adjacent property, perhaps there are opportunities for a joint venture or phased development concept that would provide some certainty regarding the future use and compatibility between the properties,” Barr added.

Other areas of concern include less ground-floor retail spots because of the residential amenities, the building height and massing, architectural treatment, building materials, parking and loading on Omega Road, stormwater compliance and landscaping, Barr said.

“The consistency with the CCSP development standards and additional ground-floor commercial space can likely be addressed through a redesign/refinement of the project,” Barr added.

The commissioners are set to provide their early feedback about both proposals Tuesday night, allowing each applicant to hear those comments and decide whether to revise their projects before submitting formal development applications to the city.

The commission’s regular meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. inside the council chambers at San Ramon City Hall, 7000 Bollinger Canyon Road.

In other business, the commission will meet earlier Tuesday, beginning at 4:30 p.m. in City Hall’s large conference room, to conduct interviews for the Transportation Advisory Committee.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Jeremy Walsh
 
Jeremy Walsh, a Benicia native and American University alum, joined Embarcadero Media in November 2013. After serving as associate editor for the Pleasanton Weekly and DanvilleSanRamon.com, he was promoted to editor of the East Bay Division in February 2017. Read more >>

Follow DanvilleSanRamon.com on Twitter @DanvilleSanRamo, Facebook and on Instagram @ for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

San Ramon reviewing pair of proposed apartment complexes

One would see The Golden Skate torn down; second would be mixed-use facility just blocks away

by /

Uploaded: Mon, Feb 20, 2017, 12:53 pm

The San Ramon Planning Commission on Tuesday is set to take an early look at design concepts for two apartment complexes proposed to sit a couple blocks apart on the northwest side of the city.

The first project calls for 227 units in a five-story building at 2701 Hooper Drive — home to The Golden Skate roller rink, which would be removed to accommodate the new apartments.

The second proposes a four-story, mixed-use complex with 200 apartments overall, along with retail spaces and residential amenities on the ground floor, at 2233 San Ramon Valley Blvd., replacing Morgan's Masonry Supply that currently exists at the site.

The separate proposals are early in the design phase, and Tuesday’s meeting is supposed to serve as initial screenings by the commission. City planning staff sees areas of concern with each proposal as currently presented.

“The value of the process is in the feedback provided by the Planning Commission and staff that allows the applicant to make informed decision regarding potential revisions to their project based on the comments received,” city senior planner Lauren Barr wrote in a staff report.

The commissioners are not considering any approvals Tuesday night, but they are scheduled to discuss each concept in depth.

First on the agenda is the Golden Skate site, a 3.37-acre parcel owned by Hassan Sharifi and his Wildflower Fields, LLC.

Developer Bay Area Property Developers, LLC, proposes to build a 227-apartment complex that stands goes from three stories at one end up to five stories at the other, with two garage levels below ground.

The early proposal calls for a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom units.

The site is designated mixed-use and zoned residential overlay in the Crow Canyon Specific Plan (CCSP).

It would be eligible for up to 168 units based on its size, under city standards, so the applicant requests a 35% density bonus to increase the output to 227 apartments, Barr said. That move would allow the project to feature 20% affordable units for very-low-income households.

City staff thinks the current proposal is too large for the site, according to Barr.

Other areas of concern include the west side of the structure coming “very close” to an earthquake fault line, the connection to Hooper Drive, wall heights, stormwater compliance, landscaping and traffic, Barr said.

Staff recommends “a less intense project given the site conditions and constraints,” according to Barr, adding:

“Absent a project redesign, staff recommends that applicant revisit the project massing and utilize the materials and architecture to maximize compatibility with the surrounding area, minimize the monolithic nature of the project and consistent with the intent of the CCSP.”

The second project, located just up the road at 2233 San Ramon Valley Blvd., calls for a four-story complex consisting of 200 apartments, with 17,600 square feet of commercial space and about 10,000 square feet of resident amenities on the ground floor of the structure.

Owned by JSA Properties, Inc. and JAS 2233, LLC, the project site consists of two parcels totaling 2.98 acres and has frontage along Omega Road, Deerwood Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard. It is zoned and designated for mixed-use.

As proposed by developer Fore Property Co., the apartments would consist of a mix of studio, one- and two-bedroom units.

The site would be eligible for 149 apartment units based on its size, so the applicant proposes a density bonus of 35% to increase to 200 apartments overall and allow for 15% of the units to be affordable.

The ground-level residential amenities could include a gym, lounge area/cybercafe, business center, bike shop and storage lockers, according to Barr. The project would feature a parking garage with four and five levels.

The complex would not be continuous along San Ramon Valley Boulevard, having to wrap around Star Auto Services, whose parcel at 2401 San Ramon Valley Blvd. is not included in the project.

“The gap in the project frontage and required buffer between residential and commercial uses is by far the most difficult to resolve,” Barr said.

City staff thinks the project would be “far better served “by acquiring and integrating the automotive property,” according to Barr.

“While staff understands that the applicant cannot compel the sale of the adjacent property, perhaps there are opportunities for a joint venture or phased development concept that would provide some certainty regarding the future use and compatibility between the properties,” Barr added.

Other areas of concern include less ground-floor retail spots because of the residential amenities, the building height and massing, architectural treatment, building materials, parking and loading on Omega Road, stormwater compliance and landscaping, Barr said.

“The consistency with the CCSP development standards and additional ground-floor commercial space can likely be addressed through a redesign/refinement of the project,” Barr added.

The commissioners are set to provide their early feedback about both proposals Tuesday night, allowing each applicant to hear those comments and decide whether to revise their projects before submitting formal development applications to the city.

The commission’s regular meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. inside the council chambers at San Ramon City Hall, 7000 Bollinger Canyon Road.

In other business, the commission will meet earlier Tuesday, beginning at 4:30 p.m. in City Hall’s large conference room, to conduct interviews for the Transportation Advisory Committee.

Comments

STOP BUILDING
San Ramon
on Feb 20, 2017 at 2:46 pm
STOP BUILDING , San Ramon
on Feb 20, 2017 at 2:46 pm

It's time for residents to stand up to the City of SR and demand them stop the building. Faria preserve is going to already overwhelm Twin Creeks Elementary school and the addition of hundreds of more apartments will also add to the overcrowding. Yes, the schools in SR are in such demand and real estate is high so many families will pack in a small apartment to get into the school district. GREED GREED GREED. Stop the building NOW.


concerned parent
San Ramon
on Feb 20, 2017 at 9:37 pm
concerned parent, San Ramon
on Feb 20, 2017 at 9:37 pm

I'm very concerned with City Senior Planner Lauren Barr's comments. Of all her concerns about the two projects, not one comment about where all of the several hundred additional children will go to school. Twin Creeks Elementary School is already overcrowded with different grades sharing classrooms, and lets not get started with the several thousand children that will be going there when the houses on the hill are built. Bad City of San Ramon Planning Department and Planning Commission, you should be ashamed. My children will end up having to share one teacher with 50-75 other children...... or more. The school cannot even afford to have a safety fence around the entire property like all other SRVUSD schools, how are they going to afford to build more classrooms.

Oh, and what about the traffic? Does the city not have a Traffic Engineer do a plan review?

I'm utterly disgusted by this upcoming daily nightmare for my family and all of the other families in this community. STOP THE DEVELOPMENT!!!!


Sur
Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 7:17 am
Sur, Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 7:17 am

It looks like San Ramon is becoming a Dublin clone. I never thought I'd see the day a five-story structure would even be considered in San Ramon.


DG McDonald
Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 9:02 am
DG McDonald, Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 9:02 am

The Golden Skate is a community treasure and should stay in its current location. Greed is killing our community.


Jack
San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 9:08 am
Jack, San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 9:08 am

The city is prohibited by state law from considering the impact on local schools when reviewing residential projects. It is up to the school district to collect impact fees and provide classroom space.


ddmom
San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 9:10 am
ddmom, San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 9:10 am

I agree with all the previous comments. What happens to Morgans? Where will it go and where will we be able to shop for landscaping supplies? We already have to leave San Ramon for most of our shopping needs and restaurants. Apartments also bring more crime. Look at Promontory Terrace.


Doug
Diablo
on Feb 21, 2017 at 12:14 pm
Doug, Diablo
on Feb 21, 2017 at 12:14 pm

I'm excited to see this. For too long we've exported our kids (and grandkids) to other cities and states once they move out. It would be great to have more choices for housing nearby. Hopefully they will build some senior housing next!


Carol
San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 12:43 pm
Carol, San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 12:43 pm

@Doug. If I can assume you are from Diablo as your post suggests, you will not have to see or experience this cracker box eyesore. The folks in SR will endure all the problems and the additional people. If such a plan was being considered in your area, I would assume you would oppose such expansion which would impact the bucolic living in which you're accustomed.


Kim
Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 2:07 pm
Kim , Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 2:07 pm

I am in shock, Danville prides themselve on the " Small home town feel" and to add over 500 homes to such a small area and really take away a amazing land mark and great out let for our kids is a shame. Where are all these kids going to school? Most have a big wait list in the place. SMH so sad to see what this place would become if that happened,


Laura
Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 3:02 pm
Laura, Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 3:02 pm

Please do not let this happen. It would be so terrible for the community, the traffic, schools, crimes, and over crowding. Stop the building.


J. smith
Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 3:16 pm
J. smith, Danville
on Feb 21, 2017 at 3:16 pm

Where does the city of San Ramon expect these kids to go to school? Our school which is not far from this planned project already has a wait list. Is the planning council considering the horrible traffic this will create? Is anyone looking for out for all of us surrounding residence?? Please DO not turn Beautiful San Ramon into another Dublin! My husband and I paid more than we could Afford to live her so we could enjoy the green Hills, small town feel, schools, and lack of horrible traffic!


Shannon
Alamo
on Feb 21, 2017 at 5:47 pm
Shannon, Alamo
on Feb 21, 2017 at 5:47 pm

You can't tear down Golden Skate! It's a treasure to the community and lots of people have good memories attached to it. There are enough ridiculous apartment buildings around please leave it alone. Put the apartments somewhere else.


M Gupta
San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 6:57 pm
M Gupta , San Ramon
on Feb 21, 2017 at 6:57 pm

Stop the tear down of the skating rink! We DO NOT need more housing//traffic!!! People love the skating rink!


Tom
San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 6:25 am
Tom, San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 6:25 am

Did any of you attend the Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday night to express your opinion? The Planning Commission doesn't read this.


frankly
San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 9:10 am
frankly, San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 9:10 am

not only do apartments, for whatever reason or good hearted purpose, bring greater number of persons with cars BUT ALSO more students with many problems which impact the quality of schools

Why kill what super schools that are here now?
More people always impact any good, quality programs with demands for something at the COST TO LOCAL TAXPAYERS!!!!


Carol
San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 9:12 am
Carol, San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 9:12 am

The vision of the planning commission is demonstrated as you drive Dougherty Rd and view the building bohemith that is Dougherty Valley, which at least provided planning for schools. The negative impact these developments have on preexisting neighborhoods can be realized in our daily existence. Overburdened schools, streets, community services can forever change the spiritual climate of a city leaving its residents feeling misrepresented and abandoned. Choose wisely planning commission our eyes are watching, and our votes participate in eliminating bad choices.


Steve
San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 11:45 am
Steve, San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 11:45 am

Did anybody read Jack's comment above? The city is prohibited from considering school crowding in it's planning decisions. That is state law. It is up to the school district to find space for all students. Similar law prohibits cities from considering water resources in planning decisions. The local water district must provide the water.


concerned
San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 9:26 pm
concerned, San Ramon
on Feb 22, 2017 at 9:26 pm

This is a concern to say the least. The number of new developments in the area are creating a an unhealthy environment. The population growth have created so many social and economical issues in the bay Area and The city of San Ramon has turned a blind eye for the single purpose of Greed.


frankly
San Ramon
on Feb 23, 2017 at 7:47 am
frankly, San Ramon
on Feb 23, 2017 at 7:47 am

Small minded so-called leadership brings on more and bigger worse living conditions for all!!!!

When have these leaders thought through the big negative impact they have on their communities?

In a very narrow valley, with the freeway being taken over by the state with controlled lanes, BRINGS MORE BAD ENVIRONMENtAL IMPACT ON THIS VERY NARROW VALLEY TO ALL.


Kristine L
San Ramon
on Feb 23, 2017 at 8:51 am
Kristine L , San Ramon
on Feb 23, 2017 at 8:51 am

We are San Ramon not Dublin! Let's preserve what is left of our beautiful, desirable city. And also keep our crime rate low! Our PD has always done an excellent job keeping us safe and they don't need additional issues due to growth.


San Ramon resident
San Ramon
on Feb 23, 2017 at 11:13 am
San Ramon resident, San Ramon
on Feb 23, 2017 at 11:13 am

These comments are great, but let's remember THE COMMENTS ARE NOT READ BY THE CITY LEADERS! You must attend a Planning Commission meeting, City Council meeting or call one of the City Council members. Unfortunately, the response you may receive is the City of San Ramon's General Plan approved this type of growth which the voters approved years ago - answer I got when I called the mayor about Faria Ranch. Still, the citizens must be heard now! Call or go to a meeting!


retired planner
Danville
on Feb 24, 2017 at 8:58 pm
retired planner, Danville
on Feb 24, 2017 at 8:58 pm

Jack is right, there is a state law that planners/commission cannot use school impact for development reviews but as a retired planner, not from this jurisdiction, there are ways to get around this law. This is a very sad time for our entire Tri-Valley community.


frankly
San Ramon
on Feb 27, 2017 at 8:04 am
frankly, San Ramon
on Feb 27, 2017 at 8:04 am

Retired Planner,

Sir, what ways are there to get around these laws?

Should our current planners and town folk be aware of these get arounds?

Hopefully, these folks will put community health and decongestation before greed or profit.

Possible?


Sorrow
San Ramon
on Feb 28, 2017 at 3:56 pm
Sorrow, San Ramon
on Feb 28, 2017 at 3:56 pm

This is horribly sad to see. I am wondering what possible positives that this could have for the city to even consider it. It must solely come down to money and greed (or people getting paid under the table). These developments do no bring anything positive to this wonderful city that the council is slowly ruining. So sad and disheartening:(


Westside Dave
Danville
on Feb 28, 2017 at 4:15 pm
Westside Dave, Danville
on Feb 28, 2017 at 4:15 pm

Nobody here should really be surprised by these proposals. The cities of Danville and San Ramon have been selling out to developers for decades now. Unfortunately the council incumbents who are running the show continually get voted back in, go figure. Traffic in the area is already a joke, that's a given anymore. The local schools will take the biggest hit I'm afraid. It's all about the tax revenues, always has been. I'm with San Ramon Rez, go to the town hall meetings, even though they most likely have already made up their minds.


Jack
San Ramon
on Mar 1, 2017 at 12:28 pm
Jack, San Ramon
on Mar 1, 2017 at 12:28 pm

Sorrow - do you really believe that Planning Commissioners or City Councilmembers are getting "paid under the table"? Do you have any evidence? If you do, please contact the FBI Public Corruption Division or the county DA's office. If you don't, then don't make the inflammatory accusations.

Have any of you considered that property owners have rights too?

If you object to these proposals, then go to the Planning Commission meetings where these proposals are discussed. Complaining on this website achieves nothing. Only testimony at public meetings is considered.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.