Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

John Fitzgerald, a Republican candidate vying to represent Danville and Alamo in Congress, has received national attention in recent days after reports by the New York Times and other news agencies detailed his history as a Holocaust denier.

Fitzgerald, who finished a comfortable but distant second place in the June primary despite being denounced by the California Republican Party, is set to appear on the general election ballot against incumbent U.S. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord) for the 11th Congressional District.

Something that Fitzgerald left off his campaign platform during the primary election was his adamant denial of the Holocaust as well as his anti-Semitic sentiments — revelations that have now taken center stage for the candidate.

“Although the reporter was somewhat fair and above board, she purposely neglected to allow approximately 90% of my interview/comments to be on record,” Fitzgerald said of the New York Times article on his Facebook page Saturday. “I now have (received) in excess of 400 people threatening to destroy me and my business via Twitter, Facebook and personal emails. Why? Because I tell the truth about Jewish elitists who have — in the past — and presently still are destroying innocent lives for Israel’s sake!”

Fitzgerald, a small business owner from Concord, has not responded to requests for comment Monday.

Running as the lone Republican candidate on the ballot, Fitzgerald earned 23% of the vote from 36,279 District 11 voters in the primary to finish in second place to DeSaulnier, who garnered 68% of the vote. Fitzgerald defeated Democrat transportation manager Dennis Lytton (5.5%) and Chris Wood (3%), who listed no party preference.

DeSaulnier and Fitzgerald will now face off in the Nov. 6 general election.

After automatically endorsing Fitzgerald following his declaration of intent to run, the California Republican Party in late May rescinded its support. In fact, state GOP chairman Jim Brulte released a statement actively condemning Fitzgerald’s candidacy.

“Those views have no home in the Republican Party. As always, California Republicans reject anti-Semitism, and all forms of religious bigotry, in the harshest terms possible. We reject John Fitzgerald’s campaign and encourage all voters to do the same,” Brulte wrote.

In recent weeks, Fitzgerald has been making an increasing number of posts on his campaign website discussing topics on “Jewish supremacy,” “anti-whiteness” in America and the decline of civility in society.

Fitzgerald appeared on a radio show last week to promote his campaign and attempt to discredit the stories of the 6 million Jews killed in Nazi concentration camps, as well as the survivors who lived through Holocaust.

“Jewish supremacists and elitists have covered up a vast amount of historical data … Everything we’ve been told about the Holocaust is a lie,” Fitzgerald said last week on a radio show hosted by adamant Holocaust denier and credited anti-Semite Andrew Carrington Hitchcock. “My entire campaign for the most part is about exposing this lie.”

On his Facebook page, Fitzgerald confirmed that he is a Holocaust denier but maintains that he is not an anti-Semite –while adding in the same breath that he has received a “thousand” negative social media messages, the majority from people that “have Jewish names associated with them.”

The national Republican Jewish Coalition has been among the organizations to speak out against Fitzgerald’s campaign.

“We absolutely and unequivocally condemn John Fitzgerald and his campaign for Congress. His anti-Semitic views have no place in our political system,” executive director Matt Brooks said.


Join the Conversation

10 Comments

  1. If he has data to prove his position, why is everyone trying to shut down his free speech? I think it is odd that people don’t want to see the proof. Are we supposed to just believe what other people say without questioning it? In a court of law, if new evidence is found, the case is re-opened. Why is that not the case here?

  2. The holocaust, which occurred during World War II, concluded in 1945. 73 years have elapsed since then. If there was any information to refute what actually happened, it would have come out by now. There is nothing stopping the candidate from putting out “new data” on this matter. It has never been easier to disseminate information to the public. Shame on you for defending this vile individual.

  3. I am confused by the statement of Mr. Jim Brulte, State GOP chairman, saying that “California Republicans reject anti-Semitism, and all forms of religious bigotry”. Seriously? The country of Israel was founded based on religious bigotry. Several generations of Palestinians have been kept in the largest open air prison in the world, treated like slaves, and massacred due to the practice of religious bigotry by the Israeli government. So, Mr. Jim Brute, please do not assume that everyone in California is stupid.

  4. I worked on the World Memory Project as a volunteer. The Nazis kept excellent records, some with photos. That anyone could still be a denier after all the proof that has been reported is a mystery to me. NEVER AGAIN!!

  5. Danville thinker, thank you for having the guts to bring this up. Most people blindly believe everything they are fed. I think Hamilton is naive in thinking all of this evidence has not been tampered with. It is amazing how easy it is to create evidence when you need to prove your position! Ask the FBI & cops. They are masters at planting evidence whenever it is convenient for them.

  6. So sad that this kind of thinking still exists in this day and age. I don’t need to say anything further, your own words expose you for what you are. “When people shows you who they are, believe them.”

  7. Hamilton is very well educated, especially on this subject. Not only were six million Jews killed, six million others were also killed. I have seen the original records of many camps. The others were the mentally, physically, and emotionally disabled, Catholics, members of the LGBTQ community, dissenters, socialists, anyone who hid or protected those already mentioned, or even kept their things for them on the chance they might return.
    I also have the privilege of having family members who lived through this.
    In my opinion, those who choose not to believe this either feel guilty, ashamed, or fear anyone not like them.
    In conclusion, I say again…NEVER AGAIN! to anyone

Leave a comment