News

San Ramon council unconvinced sticking with Waste Management is city's best choice

Council weighs options of increased price for greener services in garbage hauler

With San Ramon’s current solid waste franchise agreement set to expire in one year, the City Council continues to discuss who should manage the city’s waste and recycling services for the next 10 to 15 years, narrowing its options down to two potential companies.

After nearly three hours of deliberation at its regular meeting Tuesday night, council members remained unconvinced that its current provider, Waste Management of Alameda County, was the best choice for managing San Ramon’s waste service needs, despite city staff’s recommendation that it would be.

“This community, and it's a sign of the times, they are focused on the environment and ease of use and they will pay accordingly for those things,” Councilman Harry Sachs said at the meeting. “We want the best overall deal not the cheapest … I am not seeing that cheaper is better here. I think to take the better bid is what we ought to be doing, not the cheapest bid.”

Sachs was referring to a survey conducted by city staff in February and April, asking residents to prioritize existing and proposed solid waste and recycling services. When asked to prioritize low cost, ease of use and what is best for the environment, residents and businesses ranked the environment as their top concern, followed by ease of use, placing the lowest priority on cost of services.

While Waste Management did offer residents the lowest increase in rates, only an estimated increase of 24% for single-family homes, the rates from the other potential providers were not far off. Green Solutions of San Ramon, city staff’s second choice for the contract, offered rate increases of 31%, but did propose higher diversion rates -- the percentage of garbage that would be diverted from the landfill to a recycling center.

According to San Ramon program manager David Krueger, after initial negotiations Waste Management offered diversion rates of 67% by 2029, while Green Solutions offered 90% by that year.

“Our city has always been mindful of getting a good deal for our dollar and that's important. But our community has made some decisions that we are willing to pay a little bit more of a premium if we can get something that's really good for the environment,” Mayor Bill Clarkson said in agreement with Sachs.

While council members were mindful of the importance residents placed on the environment, they did acknowledge that overall residents have been satisfied by the services provided by Waste Management, according to the city survey.

“Your own survey shows that your residents give us a 91% rating, that we do provide very good service. Can we improve? Definitely, and we're here to do that,” said Alex Oseguera vice president and general manager at Waste Management. “You are getting a very very quality program for a very effective cost, as opposed to saying that it is a low bid.”

The council also discussed the possibility of -- should they stick with Waste Management -- outsourcing its call center from San Ramon to Phoenix, a measure that would give the city an annual savings of $439,407 a year, or 2% per user.

Toward the end of the meeting, the council decided it was not ready to make a decision and requested staff come back to a future meeting for further deliberations. The council hopes to make a decision within the next couple of weeks and give final approval to one of the garbage service providers at its Nov. 13 meeting.

Comments

3 people like this
Posted by Karyne Ghantous
a resident of San Ramon
on Sep 13, 2018 at 7:24 am

Go San Ramon! I am completely proud that this council is standing up for our environment. This discussion needs to be had by all cities. Measures to reduce waste, eliminate plastics and recycle are absolutely necessary for the future of our children and this planet. This City should be a leader in green measures all around. I am thrilled with the direction of this City under Joe Gorton, our new City Manager, so far he appears to be leading the council into actually considering the desires of the residents. The surveys the City has now adopted are well vetted and show the residents that careful consideration is being given to these decisions. Thank you Joe and the City Council for listening to our concerns and taking steps to protect our environment and future.


12 people like this
Posted by NoWay
a resident of San Ramon
on Sep 13, 2018 at 1:01 pm

Stick with Waste Mgmt! I have never had a problem with them. Another company with higher rates? NO NO NO!


4 people like this
Posted by Vicky
a resident of San Ramon
on Sep 14, 2018 at 10:38 am

The council also discussed the possibility of -- should they stick with Waste Management -- outsourcing its call center from San Ramon to Phoenix, a measure that would give the city an annual savings of $439,407 a year, or 2% per user.

If you are saying that the people do not care about the price why would you want to end San Ramon jobs and send them to Phoenix?

I care about the environment and Jobs and I have an issue in closing a call center in our community for our community. The council and waste management should be looking at other ways to save.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Battle over downtown Livermore plan heats up
By Tim Hunt | 4 comments | 1,147 views

Couples: Sex and Connection (Chicken or Egg?)
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 602 views