News

One-cent regional sales tax for transit could be on 2020 ballot

BART board hears report from advocacy groups on proposal

Bay Area voters may be asked to approve a one-cent sales tax in 2020 that would fund a wide array of transportation projects and improvements across the region.

The sales tax has been proposed by a coalition of policy advocacy groups, including the Bay Area Council, the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association, and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group.

The coalition has dubbed themselves FASTER Bay Area and presented their plan to the BART Board of Directors at a meeting in Oakland on Thursday. According to their presentation, they project the tax could raise up to $100 billion over 40 years.

The funds would be dispersed to regional transit districts, including BART, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and others. The policy groups are primarily interested in "big, transformational projects that better connect jobs to housing through a more integrated transit system," according to a memo by BART general manager Robert Powers.

That could include regional rail improvements, including more exclusive right of way for BART and Caltrain, and more express freeway lanes. It would also emphasize closing gaps between transit systems, more fare integration and improvements to transit hubs and stations.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support DanvilleSanRamon.com for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

For BART, it could include funding for a new transbay rail crossing to complement the existing Transbay Tube, which is often overcrowded during peak hours. It could also include more mundane upgrades to BART's existing infrastructure and earthquake safety improvements in the Caldecott Tunnel.

The FASTER advocates cited a 21 percent increase in commute times in Silicon Valley from 2010 to 2017 and said that was contributing to nearly half of residents responding to a recent Bay Area Council poll saying they were considering leaving the Bay Area.

FASTER has conducted polls that indicate voters are open to raising taxes for regional transportation improvements and that differences in support between funding measures are slight.

But some BART directors had concerns about the use of a sales tax, which tends to impact low-income residents more and can fluctuate widely in the event of an economic downturn.

"I am really concerned about the one-cent sales tax," said Director Janice Li, who represents portions of San Francisco, adding that she was disappointed the advocates didn't present any alternatives.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

"I think it would have been more appropriate if you said, 'here is a list of things that can get us to 100 billion, we think a sales tax is the best way,' but you didn't come with that list," Li said.

Director Rebecca Saltzman, who represents portions of Alameda and Contra Costa counties, agreed, and pointed out that the sales tax may require passage of statewide legislation first. California caps sales tax at 10.25% and Saltzman said some cities have already reached that maximum.

Furthermore, Saltzman argued that a mix of revenue streams would be better than a sales tax, which can be volatile in the event of a recession. Big projects could be forced to be put on hold when revenue plummets.

"Whatever mix you do, it's going to be more resilient than just having one type of tax," Saltzman said.

The sales tax could be on the ballot for all nine Bay Area counties in November 2020.

— Bay City News Service

Follow DanvilleSanRamon.com on Twitter @DanvilleSanRamo, Facebook and on Instagram @ for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

One-cent regional sales tax for transit could be on 2020 ballot

BART board hears report from advocacy groups on proposal

Uploaded: Sun, Aug 25, 2019, 8:13 pm

Bay Area voters may be asked to approve a one-cent sales tax in 2020 that would fund a wide array of transportation projects and improvements across the region.

The sales tax has been proposed by a coalition of policy advocacy groups, including the Bay Area Council, the San Francisco Bay Area Planning and Urban Research Association, and the Silicon Valley Leadership Group.

The coalition has dubbed themselves FASTER Bay Area and presented their plan to the BART Board of Directors at a meeting in Oakland on Thursday. According to their presentation, they project the tax could raise up to $100 billion over 40 years.

The funds would be dispersed to regional transit districts, including BART, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and others. The policy groups are primarily interested in "big, transformational projects that better connect jobs to housing through a more integrated transit system," according to a memo by BART general manager Robert Powers.

That could include regional rail improvements, including more exclusive right of way for BART and Caltrain, and more express freeway lanes. It would also emphasize closing gaps between transit systems, more fare integration and improvements to transit hubs and stations.

For BART, it could include funding for a new transbay rail crossing to complement the existing Transbay Tube, which is often overcrowded during peak hours. It could also include more mundane upgrades to BART's existing infrastructure and earthquake safety improvements in the Caldecott Tunnel.

The FASTER advocates cited a 21 percent increase in commute times in Silicon Valley from 2010 to 2017 and said that was contributing to nearly half of residents responding to a recent Bay Area Council poll saying they were considering leaving the Bay Area.

FASTER has conducted polls that indicate voters are open to raising taxes for regional transportation improvements and that differences in support between funding measures are slight.

But some BART directors had concerns about the use of a sales tax, which tends to impact low-income residents more and can fluctuate widely in the event of an economic downturn.

"I am really concerned about the one-cent sales tax," said Director Janice Li, who represents portions of San Francisco, adding that she was disappointed the advocates didn't present any alternatives.

"I think it would have been more appropriate if you said, 'here is a list of things that can get us to 100 billion, we think a sales tax is the best way,' but you didn't come with that list," Li said.

Director Rebecca Saltzman, who represents portions of Alameda and Contra Costa counties, agreed, and pointed out that the sales tax may require passage of statewide legislation first. California caps sales tax at 10.25% and Saltzman said some cities have already reached that maximum.

Furthermore, Saltzman argued that a mix of revenue streams would be better than a sales tax, which can be volatile in the event of a recession. Big projects could be forced to be put on hold when revenue plummets.

"Whatever mix you do, it's going to be more resilient than just having one type of tax," Saltzman said.

The sales tax could be on the ballot for all nine Bay Area counties in November 2020.

— Bay City News Service

Comments

What?
San Ramon
on Aug 26, 2019 at 6:42 am
What?, San Ramon
on Aug 26, 2019 at 6:42 am
19 people like this

Ahhhhhhhh, no....thank you! With all of the other taxes, I refuse to vote for another one!


Paul
Danville
on Aug 26, 2019 at 10:14 am
Paul, Danville
on Aug 26, 2019 at 10:14 am
19 people like this

I don't think so. We just had a huge gas tax shoved down our throats by Sacramento for transportation projects and upcoming toll bridge hikes among other things.14.5% max state income tax has upper income residents fleeing the state in droves with no one to take their place except the illegals pouring in paying zero taxes. This sheet has got to stop.


Long Term Resident
Danville
on Aug 28, 2019 at 7:07 am
Long Term Resident, Danville
on Aug 28, 2019 at 7:07 am
17 people like this

The obvious answer by politicians is to throw more money at issues. As a reminder, those of us in BART counties have been paying a 0.25% "temporary" sales tax supplement which was initiated in the late 1960's "until BART started operations and could fund itself". The tax is still in place and all it has done is help fund the salaries of some of the highest paid transit workers in the world. More recently, a $3.9 Billion BART bond was voted in a few years ago which was supposed to be used to improve infrastructure and buy new trains. I have seen very few new trains and no improvement to infrastructure. Instead, BART has allowed private companies to build parking structures on their property. The parking structure in Walnut Creek costs $18/day for parking. They are also in the process of building a transit hub in Walnut Creek which will remove more parking, but add more money to BART's coffers. Talk about mismanagement of funds!!

As for other infrastructure improvements, we voted in a 5 cent/gallon pothole tax in the 1970s and were promised that money would be used for road repairs. What a joke.

Lastly, what about how they have taken publicly funded freeway lanes, made them into high occupancy vehicle lanes, and turned them over to private operators to collect tolls? In a state which talks about equality I wish someone could explain how paying $5 to drive from Danville to Alamo is equality. Do they really think gardeners, plumbers, and other blue collar workers can afford to use the lanes? They pay taxes for the lanes, but can't even use them.

The bottom line is please don't keep feeding the beast with more money.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.