BART board sinks anti-panhandling ordinance

Directors do approve priority entry pilot program at SFO

A five-seat majority on BART's Board of Directors declined to move forward Thursday morning with a request that staff research and draft an ordinance cracking down on panhandlers and performers in the paid areas of the transit system.

Director Debora Allen, who represents four stations in central Contra Costa County and requested the item be put on the agenda, argued that many of her constituents feel unsafe when asked for money — especially elderly or disabled people.

BART Police Department Deputy Chief Lance Haight said his officers often get reports of panhandling or solicitation, a broader term which includes busking and dance performances accompanied by a request for donation, but are unable to take action because the activities in question do not violate state penal codes — which primarily involve disorderly conduct or "'unreasonably loud' sound equipment."

The main remedy proposed was an ordinance that would create a new criminal infraction for panhandling or solicitation in paid areas of the transit system. Director Mark Foley also floated the idea of a permitting system and Director Liz Ames inquired about posting "no panhandling" signs.

In the end, however, there were not enough votes to move forward with restrictions of any kind.

Director Robert Raburn pointed out that a number of outstanding musicians have started their careers busking on BART, citing examples like The California Honeydrops and Oakland's own Fantastic Negrito.

Director Janice Li called crafting an anti-panhandling ordinance a bad use of the board's time and the district's staff resources. She also expressed concern that by authorizing police to crack down on buskers and panhandlers, the increased number of police interactions could be accompanied by an increased number of use-of-force cases.

Li advocated for implementing an ambassador program, in which BART staff would have a visible presence in the stations rather than police, as a means to address public safety concerns. She also urged the board to focus on other issues like train and station cleanliness, train temperature and on-time performance.

Directors Lateefah Simon and Rebecca Saltzman cast their lot with Li, as did Board President Bevan Dufty - who argued that much of the day's discussion was driven by falsehoods surrounding poverty.

"My disgust is that we are pushing such a false issue right now," Dufty said.

"Let's do a better job of addressing what the real problems are," he added.

Ames, Foley and Director John McPartland expressed support for Allen's move to place some kind of restrictions on panhandling in paid areas of the station.

"I think we're hearing that there are five directors who are not interested," Allen said.

She plans to seek additional support from allies on the board and resurrect the matter sometime in 2020.

The board also approved the first step to providing BART passengers traveling to San Francisco International Airport a priority entry line for security screening. The pilot program will depend on "trip verification technology" allowing SFO staff to scan the passenger's Clipper card and verify that they arrived on public transportation.

If successful, it could also be considered at Oakland International Airport. The next step is for BART engineers to begin developing the software, but at this time there is no estimated date for project completion.

— Bay City News Service

What is democracy worth to you?
Support local journalism.


6 people like this
Posted by Dan
a resident of Danville
on Oct 29, 2019 at 8:11 am

BART ridership is declining while the population and commuter times increase. Wonder why that is?
Thoughts anyone?

12 people like this
Posted by Long Term Resident
a resident of Danville
on Oct 30, 2019 at 10:00 am

This is crazy. Where to start when it comes to mismanagement at BART. First, most of the panhandlers would not be on the trains if the station agents and BART police controlled the pay gates better. Secondly, I am not paying good money to ride a filthy dirty system which is unsafe, and I'm certainly not paying to sit and have people approach me for money, drugs, etc. There can be no justification for allowing the current situation to continue. It is laughable that one of the board members believes good musicians and bands can be formed by allowing that on BART.

I do not allow my family to ride BART other than commute hours when there are enough people on the trains to hopefully help protect them. I have personally had numerous bad experiences on BART where I felt endangered. I know many others who feel the same way. Uber, Taxis, and limo services are more expensive, but much safer.

I have traveled all over the world and I can honestly say that BART is one of the worst systems all things considered. Systems in Japan, Singapore, Shanghai, Moscow, Delhi, Bangkok, etc. are all much better than BART.

5 people like this
Posted by KellyGamble
a resident of San Ramon
on Oct 30, 2019 at 11:45 pm

KellyGamble is a registered user.

Now panhandlers have rights..who next? Everybody besides decent, hard working Americans.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

All your news. All in one place. Every day.

Living as Roommates? Not Having Much Sex?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 3,069 views

Could new quarry operations threaten PG&E gas pipeline on Isabel Avenue?
By Tim Hunt | 5 comments | 1,388 views