News

Around the Valley: Influencing elections

With most of the ballots counted, voters in San Ramon have elected (from left) Dave Hudson as mayor, Mark Armstrong as councilmember for District 2 and Marisol Rubio for City Council District 4. (File photos)

A close look at San Ramon's 2022 candidate campaign finance filings set off alarm bells for me. It appears special interests and outside money are creeping in to influence local elections while drowning out the voice of the residents.

Sadly, this will probably be the last election in the city in which candidates will run for a seat on the dais without accepting money from special interest groups like developers, unions, political organizations and the like.

Big money from organizations with deep pockets and independent expenditures (IEs) from groups with an agenda make a difference in elections. This is well known and widely practiced.

Large contributions from outside groups have been happening at the county level for a while. A George Soros-backed PAC spent a lot of money on Diana Becton's campaigns in 2020 and this June, both of which Becton won.

Big money has flooded Livermore elections for years. This year, hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent supporting mayoral and council candidates who will do the bidding of the primary funders of the PACs, and to mislead the public about the candidates they oppose.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

But this is the first time, at least in recent memory, San Ramon candidates have received so much outside, special interest money. This and party affiliation seem to have contributed to the outcome in at least one, possibly two, races.

Around 85% of the roughly $156,560 total raised by the seven candidates (including loans and independent expenditures) came from special interest groups and organizations and individuals outside of the city.

Take, for example, San Ramon's District 4 race between parks commissioner Heidi Kenniston-Lee and Dublin San Ramon Services District Director Marisol Rubio.

Rubio reported contributions of about $25,000, with only $200 contributed by a San Ramon resident (who doesn't live in District 4). About $20,350 was contributed by individuals outside of the city, from special interest groups such as the Sheet Metal Workers, Plumbers and Teamsters unions and the San Ramon Valley Democratic Club. She also received a $1,300 IE from the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County for what appears to be a joint mailer that included mayoral candidate Sabina Zafar and District 2 council candidate Sara Lashanlo which means she also got the added benefit of party affiliation (even though a council race is non-partisan) and their mailing list.

Kenniston-Lee raised approximately $5,880, primarily from San Ramon residents. She received no money from special interest groups and no independent expenditures.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

As of Thursday, Nov. 17, Rubio was leading with 64.18% of the ballot count compared with Kenniston-Lee's 35.82%.

The largest amount contributed to any San Ramon campaign was an IE supporting incumbent Mayor Dave Hudson totaling $60,000 from a PAC, the "Committee for Jobs," with money from Chevron, Phillips 66 and Marathon Oil, among others.

An independent expenditure is, basically, money spent on communication in support or opposition of a candidate without the approval of or coordination with the candidate. In fact, candidates by law cannot be involved in any way with an independent expenditure. Receiving IEs shouldn't reflect poorly on a candidate because they have no control over them.

The fact remains, though, IEs are made by organizations and individuals usually outside of a community in an attempt to influence elections.

(This is total speculation: Maybe the IE came in from oil producers because, as mayor, Hudson is on the Board of Directors at Bay Area Air Quality Management District.)

Totals on Nov. 17 showed Hudson at 48.73% of the vote for reelection, followed by outgoing Councilmember Zafar, who raised a little over $35,000, with 27.68% and challenger Dinesh Govindarao, who raised about $8,100, at 23.59%.

The next largest category to contribute to San Ramon candidate campaigns were the special interest groups, which raised approximately $52,250. This is more than all the individual contributions by residents and outsiders combined.

In addition to Kenniston-Lee, District 2 candidate Mark Armstrong, who was appointed to the city council when Hudson was elected mayor in 2020, did not receive contributions from special interest groups or IEs. He raised $8,480, and his opponent Lashanlo raised slightly more, about $10,100.

Armstrong (with name recognition) secured a comfortable victory in his first campaign for election with 59.36% of the vote as of the latest count. Lashanlo was at 40.64%.

It is unfortunate grassroots support from residents does not overcome the name recognition that money and party affiliation can buy. (Not to mention how sad it is that some people vote on name recognition and party affiliation.)

That's not to say Rubio won't serve San Ramon well. I'm confident she will. I'm just bothered that outside groups, money and politics had such an obvious impact on a local, supposedly non-partisan election.

Editor's note: Gina Channell Wilcox has been the president and publisher of Embarcadero Media Group's East Bay Division since 2006. Her "Around the Valley" column runs the first and third Fridays of the month.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Looking for more Livermore stories? The Livermore Vine will be your new source of vital news and information. Sign up to be among the first to get our daily local news headlines sent to your inbox for free.

Gina Channell Wilcox
Gina Channell Wilcox is the president and publisher of Embarcadero Media's East Bay division. She previously worked as the executive editor/associate publisher at a division of the Chicago Sun-Times and has earned several state and national journalism awards, including for investigative journalism and in-depth reporting. Read more >>

Follow DanvilleSanRamon.com on Twitter @DanvilleSanRamo, Facebook and on Instagram @ for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you city government news. Become a member today.

Around the Valley: Influencing elections

by / Danville San Ramon

Uploaded: Fri, Nov 18, 2022, 5:06 am

A close look at San Ramon's 2022 candidate campaign finance filings set off alarm bells for me. It appears special interests and outside money are creeping in to influence local elections while drowning out the voice of the residents.

Sadly, this will probably be the last election in the city in which candidates will run for a seat on the dais without accepting money from special interest groups like developers, unions, political organizations and the like.

Big money from organizations with deep pockets and independent expenditures (IEs) from groups with an agenda make a difference in elections. This is well known and widely practiced.

Large contributions from outside groups have been happening at the county level for a while. A George Soros-backed PAC spent a lot of money on Diana Becton's campaigns in 2020 and this June, both of which Becton won.

Big money has flooded Livermore elections for years. This year, hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent supporting mayoral and council candidates who will do the bidding of the primary funders of the PACs, and to mislead the public about the candidates they oppose.

But this is the first time, at least in recent memory, San Ramon candidates have received so much outside, special interest money. This and party affiliation seem to have contributed to the outcome in at least one, possibly two, races.

Around 85% of the roughly $156,560 total raised by the seven candidates (including loans and independent expenditures) came from special interest groups and organizations and individuals outside of the city.

Take, for example, San Ramon's District 4 race between parks commissioner Heidi Kenniston-Lee and Dublin San Ramon Services District Director Marisol Rubio.

Rubio reported contributions of about $25,000, with only $200 contributed by a San Ramon resident (who doesn't live in District 4). About $20,350 was contributed by individuals outside of the city, from special interest groups such as the Sheet Metal Workers, Plumbers and Teamsters unions and the San Ramon Valley Democratic Club. She also received a $1,300 IE from the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County for what appears to be a joint mailer that included mayoral candidate Sabina Zafar and District 2 council candidate Sara Lashanlo which means she also got the added benefit of party affiliation (even though a council race is non-partisan) and their mailing list.

Kenniston-Lee raised approximately $5,880, primarily from San Ramon residents. She received no money from special interest groups and no independent expenditures.

As of Thursday, Nov. 17, Rubio was leading with 64.18% of the ballot count compared with Kenniston-Lee's 35.82%.

The largest amount contributed to any San Ramon campaign was an IE supporting incumbent Mayor Dave Hudson totaling $60,000 from a PAC, the "Committee for Jobs," with money from Chevron, Phillips 66 and Marathon Oil, among others.

An independent expenditure is, basically, money spent on communication in support or opposition of a candidate without the approval of or coordination with the candidate. In fact, candidates by law cannot be involved in any way with an independent expenditure. Receiving IEs shouldn't reflect poorly on a candidate because they have no control over them.

The fact remains, though, IEs are made by organizations and individuals usually outside of a community in an attempt to influence elections.

(This is total speculation: Maybe the IE came in from oil producers because, as mayor, Hudson is on the Board of Directors at Bay Area Air Quality Management District.)

Totals on Nov. 17 showed Hudson at 48.73% of the vote for reelection, followed by outgoing Councilmember Zafar, who raised a little over $35,000, with 27.68% and challenger Dinesh Govindarao, who raised about $8,100, at 23.59%.

The next largest category to contribute to San Ramon candidate campaigns were the special interest groups, which raised approximately $52,250. This is more than all the individual contributions by residents and outsiders combined.

In addition to Kenniston-Lee, District 2 candidate Mark Armstrong, who was appointed to the city council when Hudson was elected mayor in 2020, did not receive contributions from special interest groups or IEs. He raised $8,480, and his opponent Lashanlo raised slightly more, about $10,100.

Armstrong (with name recognition) secured a comfortable victory in his first campaign for election with 59.36% of the vote as of the latest count. Lashanlo was at 40.64%.

It is unfortunate grassroots support from residents does not overcome the name recognition that money and party affiliation can buy. (Not to mention how sad it is that some people vote on name recognition and party affiliation.)

That's not to say Rubio won't serve San Ramon well. I'm confident she will. I'm just bothered that outside groups, money and politics had such an obvious impact on a local, supposedly non-partisan election.

Editor's note: Gina Channell Wilcox has been the president and publisher of Embarcadero Media Group's East Bay Division since 2006. Her "Around the Valley" column runs the first and third Fridays of the month.

Comments

Parent and Voter
Registered user
Danville
on Nov 18, 2022 at 7:04 am
Parent and Voter, Danville
Registered user
on Nov 18, 2022 at 7:04 am

In the perfect world we would not have large outside donations influence local or Statewide elections. Unfortunately that ship has sailed. We have had big money donors such as Soros and Zuckerberg influences elections that are not even in their own communities.
The article was interesting but it really was only part news and part opinion and speculation.
Just an observation.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.