News

Guest Opinion: The responsibility of local control

Those of us involved in local government talk about the importance of local control. The thinking is that those who live in the community know best what the community needs. I agree. Therefore, if we don't want the state deciding our fate, we need to act in our own best interest.

Jack Balch, current vice mayor of Pleasanton. (Contributed photo)

Like many decisions, this requires conversation and compromise. At its December council meeting, Pleasanton relinquished another chance for local control by voting against a compromise solution that would put the Pleasanton Unified School District on an economically viable path to achieve teacher workforce housing with a local solution.

PUSD is facing a very real problem finding teachers and staff to support and educate our children. Like any employer, their challenges are numerous: recruitment and retention, vacillating state funding, fluctuating student enrollment and affordable teacher workforce housing, to name a few. It should come as no surprise that PUSD is looking for viable solutions.

PUSD has been dutifully participating in the city's Housing Element process by asking that two of its properties be evaluated for housing.

In a letter to the city, PUSD affirmed their desire to find solutions to address teacher turnover and acute staffing shortages by "converting unused or underutilized property to build teacher and workforce housing." For success, PUSD requested that its district office site (on Bernal and First) be granted a density range of eight to 20 dwelling units per acre and their Vineyard site (on Vineyard and Thiessen) be granted a density range of three to five dwelling units per acre.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Under recently passed state legislation, AB 2295, which was discussed at the December council meeting, school districts are now allowed to bypass city zoning requirements and build on their own land for teachers and others. The city may only impose basic design standards.

Moreover, school districts operating under the banner of AB 2295 are required to develop projects with a minimum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, with 30% of the units restricted to lower- or moderate-income levels.

After receiving this information, the council voted 3-1 to lower the density range to eight to 12 dwelling units per acre at the district site, well below the district's requested eight to 20 dwelling units per acre, and less than half of the minimum 30 dwelling units per acre available under AB 2295. At this lower density, it won't pencil out for our school district to build urgently needed teacher and workforce housing given current building costs.

If you were our school district, what would you do?

We want local control to be able to design and locate housing that is compatible with our existing neighborhoods and community. We want the ability to address Pleasanton's challenges with innovative solutions in partnership with others. We want to strengthen our partnership with PUSD to support our children and families.

However, having local control comes with the responsibility to use it judiciously in finding solutions to achieve the best outcomes for our community. The school district came to the City Council in good faith and sought a compromised local solution. Some of us chose not to take it.

The council is to discuss this topic at a special meeting on Jan. 26. Voice your opinion by emailing your City Council at [email protected]

Editor's note: Vice Mayor Jack Balch is in his third year serving on the Pleasanton City Council. He was the lone dissenting vote in the 3-1 decision from the Dec. 20 council meeting related to the PUSD property. This opinion piece was submitted before the Planning Commission meeting took place on Wednesday.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Follow DanvilleSanRamon.com on Twitter @DanvilleSanRamo, Facebook and on Instagram @ for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local city government news. Become a member today.

Guest Opinion: The responsibility of local control

by Jack Balch /

Uploaded: Sun, Jan 15, 2023, 2:17 pm

Those of us involved in local government talk about the importance of local control. The thinking is that those who live in the community know best what the community needs. I agree. Therefore, if we don't want the state deciding our fate, we need to act in our own best interest.

Like many decisions, this requires conversation and compromise. At its December council meeting, Pleasanton relinquished another chance for local control by voting against a compromise solution that would put the Pleasanton Unified School District on an economically viable path to achieve teacher workforce housing with a local solution.

PUSD is facing a very real problem finding teachers and staff to support and educate our children. Like any employer, their challenges are numerous: recruitment and retention, vacillating state funding, fluctuating student enrollment and affordable teacher workforce housing, to name a few. It should come as no surprise that PUSD is looking for viable solutions.

PUSD has been dutifully participating in the city's Housing Element process by asking that two of its properties be evaluated for housing.

In a letter to the city, PUSD affirmed their desire to find solutions to address teacher turnover and acute staffing shortages by "converting unused or underutilized property to build teacher and workforce housing." For success, PUSD requested that its district office site (on Bernal and First) be granted a density range of eight to 20 dwelling units per acre and their Vineyard site (on Vineyard and Thiessen) be granted a density range of three to five dwelling units per acre.

Under recently passed state legislation, AB 2295, which was discussed at the December council meeting, school districts are now allowed to bypass city zoning requirements and build on their own land for teachers and others. The city may only impose basic design standards.

Moreover, school districts operating under the banner of AB 2295 are required to develop projects with a minimum density of 30 dwelling units per acre, with 30% of the units restricted to lower- or moderate-income levels.

After receiving this information, the council voted 3-1 to lower the density range to eight to 12 dwelling units per acre at the district site, well below the district's requested eight to 20 dwelling units per acre, and less than half of the minimum 30 dwelling units per acre available under AB 2295. At this lower density, it won't pencil out for our school district to build urgently needed teacher and workforce housing given current building costs.

If you were our school district, what would you do?

We want local control to be able to design and locate housing that is compatible with our existing neighborhoods and community. We want the ability to address Pleasanton's challenges with innovative solutions in partnership with others. We want to strengthen our partnership with PUSD to support our children and families.

However, having local control comes with the responsibility to use it judiciously in finding solutions to achieve the best outcomes for our community. The school district came to the City Council in good faith and sought a compromised local solution. Some of us chose not to take it.

The council is to discuss this topic at a special meeting on Jan. 26. Voice your opinion by emailing your City Council at [email protected]

Editor's note: Vice Mayor Jack Balch is in his third year serving on the Pleasanton City Council. He was the lone dissenting vote in the 3-1 decision from the Dec. 20 council meeting related to the PUSD property. This opinion piece was submitted before the Planning Commission meeting took place on Wednesday.

Comments

H
Registered user
San Ramon Valley High School
on Jan 16, 2023 at 9:32 am
H, San Ramon Valley High School
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 9:32 am

This is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. What other local school district has built housing dormitories for teachers and staff? I can't think of any. How many California Distinguished Schools did PUSD have this year? Zero. Unlike Dublin and San Ramon - both of which spend more time on looking at educating and supporting staff rather than this delusion.

Maybe Balch should be asking why other school local districts are succeeding where his is failing. I'm sure part of the reason is the other district aren't wasting their time making politically convenient excuses for failure.


Ron Bevaqua
Registered user
another community
on Jan 16, 2023 at 10:50 am
Ron Bevaqua, another community
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 10:50 am

It is the responsibility and obligation of a community to provide or offer affordable housing options for its public school teachers.

Either that, or find other teachers willing to commute from far away places


H
Registered user
San Ramon Valley High School
on Jan 16, 2023 at 11:59 am
H, San Ramon Valley High School
Registered user
on Jan 16, 2023 at 11:59 am

Ron Bevaqua you are wrong. It’s absolutely not the responsibility of these locations to house these people. How many Oakland or Peninsula teachers and firefighters live in the trivalley by choice? Many. How many successful trivalley schools have built housing dormitories for teachers and staff? Zero.

Hijacking education to meet political demands of progressive extremism doesn’t work. Stop predicating successful education on the enactment of outlandish progressive demands.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.