The Danville community squared off with PG&E officials at the latest Town Council meeting, following months of power outages and outcry from Danville residents and officials, including a formal letter from Town Manager Joe Calabrigo to the energy company last month.
With the recent outages having impacted businesses, restaurants, the town offices and local schools, PG&E's regional vice president Aaron Johnson and regional government relations manager Sarah Yoell -- a Danville resident herself -- joined council members Tuesday evening for a public presentation aimed at explaining the outages in Danville and addressing questions and concerns.
"Your reliability has been unacceptable, and we fell short in our responsibility to the Town of Danville," Yoell said at the start of the evening's discussion. "As we work to strengthen our system and improve your reliability, your feedback is critical."
The cause of the outages, according to Yoell and Johnson, can be traced back to safety settings on PG&E infrastructure that are aimed at reducing wildfire risk, but that can result in loss of power for prolonged periods of time in hot weather under their current level of sensitivity.
"In 2021 we began implementing new, more sensitive safety settings to address the extreme drought conditions and decrease wildfire risk we were seeing throughout our service area," Yoell said. "These are the enhanced powerline safety settings, or EPSS, which you've heard a lot about.
The EPSS, in addition to public safety power shutoffs (PSPS), have been effective at preventing wildfires, Yoell said, but the safety measures have come at the expense of reliability for many Danville customers, Yoell said.
During a PSPS, Yoell noted that customers miles outside of the hazardous conditions they're meant to mitigate can be impacted, with the recent outages in Danville being a stark example.
However, this was all information that had already been provided to the council in letters from Johnson in response to Calabrigo's initial correspondence to PG&E last month, and which had failed to satisfy the council and other community members who'd been impacted by the frequent, abrupt, and sometimes lengthy periods of time without power over the summer.
Johnson provided additional details on the background and technology behind the EPSS option and the PSPS outages, as well as distinguishing them from outages brought on by a more sensitive EPPS option. He pointed to recent upgrades to infrastructure and work that was scheduled for the end of the year but pushed ahead in the wake of reliability issues in Danville and the surrounding area.
But the council had additional questions.
"All we have is a system that's being shut off and nobody knows why," Councilmember Newell Arnerich said. "Now when you talk about how it would help if we were all connected -- we are connected."
"So we do have that connectivity," he continued. "Silicon Valley sleeps here at night. We all run companies, so what we expect is if there's a problem, there's a solution; there is a plan. We are frustrated. Where is your plan? We are told that the power is out most of the time because we don't know."
Arnerich asked for specifics about the plan to address power outages in Danville, pointing to the 40 outages over the past three months, and questioned the effectiveness of the existing technology and when it would be upgraded to enhance reliability.
Johnson agreed that the infrastructure in place was relatively low-tech, as well as issues faced by PG&E workers in pinpointing the precise location of a specific outage, let alone a precise cause, throughout the region. He pointed to past, current and future efforts to address this, and said that the location aspect was at least becoming easier with modifications and upgrades throughout the Bay Area region.
He emphasized that the state of power reliability in Danville and PG&E's low performance in the town over the past several months made upgrades to infrastructure in the area a top priority for the region.
"Given the reliability we're seeing in this area, I expect more and more work as we systematically replace that equipment," Johnson said.
In addition to numerous questions and comments from five-member Town Council, Johnson and Yoell heard from several members of the public about the personal impacts of the outages and the risks and losses faced by sectors including healthcare, hospitality, and education.
"Power outages are extremely disruptive to our students, family and staff," San Ramon Valley Unified School District Trustee Shelly Clark said. "Over the course of the last school year alone and into this school year so far, we have had a total of 29 power outages at eight schools in Danville and three schools in Alamo. And these don't account for power outages that happen outside of school hours."
"Outages not only lead to an interruption in the educational process and a lack of access to technology, but there are many other detrimental and costly consequences as well," Clark added.
Among these consequences, Clark pointed to an estimated $5,000 lost by the district in food due to weekend power outages, "significant" overtime pay for on-call staff brought in to check on power outages at district schools during off hours, and a lack of access to phones at district offices during power outages that prevents parents from having reliable means to contact their children's schools.
She also noted that power outages prevent obstacles to keeping classrooms at comfortable temperatures with sufficient lighting -- as well as at least one incident of high school students during the spring semester being prevented from completing their AP testing during an outage.
Vice Mayor Karen Stepper asked Johnson to join the Danville Area Chamber of Commerce to hear more from small business owners in particular about their losses from the recent outages, with the council overall pointing to the significance of outages in Downtown Danville in particular.
"This is hard on them -- they can't keep taking these kicks, whether it's from COVID or it's from power outages," Stepper said.
With that night's agenda item being informational only with no vote set on an action item, Johnson said that he would bring the feedback from the night's discussion to executives at PG&E, and agreed to more frequent communication with the council and coordination surrounding ongoing outages in the area.
Many remained frustrated with the lack of specific action and commitment at the end of the discussion, although all parties involved agreed to further dialogue on the issue and to seek ways to address the recent outages in Danville in particular.
Mayor Robert Storer said that in the interim, he wished he could see more transparency from PG&E, suggesting to Johsnon that the company implement the same level of marketing in order to educate customers about potential interruptions rather than just to tout recent wildfire prevention and conservation efforts.
"You have to be the best game in town, and right now you're not," Storer said. "And I think you can be, and I think what we've heard from you is really positive comments, but we've got to have something behind it that will make our residents believe that PG&E is rolling in the direction we'd like to see you go. Now we know it's going to take some time. But tell us how much time it's going to take."
Comments
Registered user
Danville
on Sep 7, 2023 at 6:31 am
Registered user
on Sep 7, 2023 at 6:31 am
Not one of our town council members, who allegedly are suppose to represent our interests, has suggested any concrete measures that would hold PG & E responsible for their malfeasance. How come none of our town council members have pushed for an agreement from PG & E that each household or business that loses their power more than once per month would get an automatic rebate of $100 on their next month's PG & E bill?
Perhaps it is time for us to elect new town council members who actually will do their job and represent our interests and hold PG & E responsible.
Registered user
San Ramon Valley High School
on Sep 7, 2023 at 6:53 am
Registered user
on Sep 7, 2023 at 6:53 am
Newell Arnerich is a clown that wants to perform. Actual results don't mater to him.
Registered user
Danville
on Sep 7, 2023 at 8:55 am
Registered user
on Sep 7, 2023 at 8:55 am
This revelation is nonsense:
"In 2021 we began implementing new, more sensitive safety settings to address the extreme drought conditions and decrease wildfire risk we were seeing throughout our service area," Yoell said. "These are the enhanced powerline safety settings, or EPSS, which you've heard a lot about.
The EPSS, in addition to public safety power shutoffs (PSPS), have been effective at preventing wildfires, Yoell said, but the safety measures have come at the expense of reliability for many Danville customers, Yoell said.
During a PSPS, Yoell noted that customers miles outside of the hazardous conditions they're meant to mitigate can be impacted, with the recent outages in Danville being a stark example."
If the power outages were caused by "inappropriate safety settings" and not equipment failures, It would seem to me that turning the power back on would not take hours or days, but a matter of minutes. I am sorry I was unable to attend last night's "meeting," but from the article above and the other responses, it appears that PG&E took the Town Council for a "ride." As they say, "you get what you vote for," and when you look at the composition of the "Town Council" you realize that most of them have been "on the job" since Danville chose to be incorporated. I doubt that anything of substance will come from this meeting. It's just a way for the Council and PG&E to "stroke" the residents, because it takes money to fix problems, and at this point in time PG&E doesn't have much to spend.
Registered user
Danville
on Sep 7, 2023 at 7:10 pm
Registered user
on Sep 7, 2023 at 7:10 pm
Not only did PG&E fall short but so did this article.
I would encourage all of you to listen to the Sept. 5th Town Council meeting.
A big Thank You' to Councilmember Renee Morgan for asking the hard questions and demanding answers! Thank you for stepping up for your constituents.
Registered user
Danville
on Sep 19, 2023 at 9:10 am
Registered user
on Sep 19, 2023 at 9:10 am
Well Folks,
It didn't take long! PG&E "Fell Short" again last night for 4,000 of us who live on the east side of I 680 in Danville. Power failed at about 9 p.m., and was "restored" about an hour ago (8 a.m). First their automated system said restoration would be no later that 12:15 a.m. This morning they said that they had somehow "reduced" the number of affected customers to about 400. When I called to talk to "a real person," she could not explain how a single outage could be reduced by 90% because the outage was caused, or so she said, by "downed power lines." Again our trusty Honda Generator kept us "from being in the dark." I think the Danville Town Council needs to "invite" PG&E back, and this time ask hard questions about the condition of their outside plant. From my reading of the last proceedings, it appears that PG&E brought their publicist, and not their corporate execs and their engineers, so what the Council was treated to was a bunch of BS! PG&E has become a failed public utility.
Registered user
Danville
16 hours ago
Registered user
16 hours ago
I submitted my post. Do not see here
vijaya
Registered user
Danville
16 hours ago
Registered user
16 hours ago
My earlier comment was that Because of shut down, my electric bill has tripled. I was away and when the power came back, triggered all lights. so they are burning for 24/7. I am 82 years old and attending to some medical issues. So I could not return immediately to take care of this issue. No one has a key to the house to enter. Called PG&E and no help. Plan to return as soon as I hear the results of my MRi of 9/19/23 and cleared to travel. In the meantime, the bill is shooting up. I like the suggestion by another writer for some refund. Did not expect to get sick and did not expect power outage. Don't know who to contact at PG&E. If anyone has any suggestion, please contact me. Thanks.
vijaya
Registered user
Danville
15 hours ago
Registered user
15 hours ago
To vijaya
I am a little further out on the back side of 80 than you are. In looking into how to contact PG&E it looks as though "they have a short arm when it comes to reaching for the check."
Go to:Web Link and there are a gaggle of ways to contact them for stuff that's important to them, but their customers, not so much. They appear to operate like the cable TV companies (your call is important to us so we will keep you on hold for 30 minutes or more because our "service desk in the Philippines" is currently having exceptionally high call volume"), so start calling their numbers. If they don't respond, call the CA Public Utilities Commission, or Danville Town Hall and see if they have a way to "break through." Public Utilities today don't want to help you, they just want you to pay your bill on time and not bother them.
As an aside, I met with local friends for coffee yesterday and ALL OF THEM are POed at both PG&E AND The Danville Town Council over the recent "Holding PG&E's Feet to the Fire Meeting." Gist of it was that the Danville Town Council got played.