Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Contra Costa Community College Governing Board President Tomi Van de Brooke already has insight into the workings of a county supervisor — the Orinda resident was chief of staff to Supervisor Mary Piepho for three years, when District 3 included the San Ramon Valley.

Born and raised in Contra Costa County, Van de Brooke has worked for Fortune 500 companies, was the managing partner of a Walnut Creek communications firm and has also worked for the California Alliance for Jobs, an organization dedicated to rebuilding California’s aging infrastructure. Van de Brooke says her experience in both the private and public sectors makes her a uniquely qualified candidate for the Board of Supervisors.

“I have a passion for constituent services, for making sure our local streets are paved, making sure that we have efficient staffing and response times,” Van de Brooke said, adding that she does not plan on campaigning for state or federal office. “I really reflect the community as someone who was born and raised here and has watched the area grow.”

Locally, Van de Brooke has worked on Measure J (an extension of Measure C which provided funding for local transportation projects) and on the Contra Costa Council. As a supervisor, Van de Brooke said she would to use her business acumen to re-prioritize funding for police, fire and infrastructure services within the county.

“In a time of declining revenues, which we’ve seen the last several years, we need to preserve certain core services like fire, police and funding for local roads,” she said.

The county currently uses funds meant for local programs to pay for state-mandated ones such as the county hospital, Van de Brooke said. Rather than continuing to use local monies for state programs, the candidate hopes to improve and maintain local infrastructure.

“It’s not our role to take money out of our local program dollars to address a state need. You’ve got to keep your house in order before you start helping others and Contra Costa County needs to fully fund its police, fire and maintain its roads before it starts choosing to take money from the local government side of what we do…it’s just good budgeting.”

Van de Brooke noted that, when she first arrived at the community college board, it had a less than 5 percent reserve. Seven years later, the board has a 23 percent reserve it can call on to provide classes and support services.

In addition to restructuring the county budget, Van de Brooke wants to improve county health care delivery by bringing hospitals and clinics “into the digital world.” The way information is delivered within the county hospital system is not sustainable and, during her term as supervisor, Van de Brooke plans to look at efficiency and changes to federal health care requirements. The county hospital must be weaned off local tax dollars, she said.

Van de Brooke will also focus on job creation and business retention. She pointed to Bishop Ranch as a community asset that creates jobs and a better quality of life for county residents. The healthier and more successful the county can make companies like Bishop Ranch, the better the community will be, she said.

If elected, Van de Brooke also plans to set performance measures for the county, similar to those set on the college board, to make sure the supervisors are accountable and transparent to their residents. Transparency should be the lifeblood of government, she said, adding that the county must make sure its residents are adequately served.

Local government needs to “be transparent in its information, and effective with its taxpayers dollars, and accountable,” Van de Brooke said. “When I worked in the supervisor’s office, I was dedicated to making the department come in and explain their budgets in a way that made sense for the community. And I held the staffs accountable; I wasn’t the most popular within the staff.”

In the same vein, Van de Brooke said she would be a proactive supervisor who isn’t afraid to “rock the boat when it needs to get rocked.”

“I am not one to sit back and watch things happen, I’m going to make things happen,” she said. “I’m a fixer by nature and I’m not a go-with-the-flow when things aren’t working person. I have no future political ambition that will cause me to be careful.”

Van de Brooke is endorsed by Congressman George Miller (CA-7), Sen. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord), State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, several members of the Alamo MAC, the Contra Costa Building and Construction Trades Council and Planned Parenthood Shasta Pacific Action, among others.

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. Her bio sounded GREAT until the bottom where it says, “Van de Brooke is endorsed by Congressman George Miller (CA-7), Sen. Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord).”

    No thanks.

  2. We simply cannot afford to have one more liberal union supporter on the Board of Supervisors. It would be the death-knell for our county.

  3. Alamo Ron,

    Yes I did. However, I also overlooked something else…. Ms. Andersen is also endorsed by the DA’s union. That makes 2 County unions supporting her. Personally I could care less, but if you are stuck on the union thing, it might be food for thought.

  4. Welcome back to Ron, Gina,

    To define how a majority look at Tomi among district 2 voters based on her “pro-choice woman” presentation in creed prejudice against conservative religious positions, Tomi is now recognized as a “Berkeley Liberal” deeply dependent on the voice of Democratic clubs in our region. In reviewing such democratic dogma, Tomi is portrayed as an atheist and deeply prejudice against LDS, CPC, Catholics, and other religions.

    Quite simply that is not reality. Tomi is a cordial, bright and engaging individual that is falsely portrayed by her supporters and the Contra Costa political consortium. The message has changed now that “pro-choice woman” was equated to creed prejudice against Candace Andersen and all conservative Christians.

    This morning an effective profile of Tomi was presented on message to district 2 voters. In fairness, let’s take the message back to that point and let real issues be dealt with beyond the attack brutality of Informed Resident and other sponsored commentators.

  5. Doing damage control now Hal?

    Labeling Tomi as a “Berkeley liberal” is quite a stretch even for you. Perhaps you have Tomi confused with Sean White (the third candidate). So who besides YOU is portraying Tomi as an atheist? Or is that just you doing your best at projection.

    It appears you want to change the subject since Candace’s connection to the County unions has been exposed.

    You of all people Hal are going to have a hard time convincing methat you now are aligned with the majority per your statement “To define how a majority look at Tomi…”

    Hal, you sure like to speak for others, perhaps you should consider running for office where you would actually be able to do just that. If that is what you covet, I say give it a shot. One way or another you might learn something.

  6. How about a write-in ? Both of these candidates are just more of the same old, get-along, and go-along political hack we can do without.

  7. Ah, Gina, do you remember the many emails you sent me around midnight during those early months of destroying the reputation and reality of the Danville Weekly? It seems you are working the night shift again and becoming more than a sponsor of defamation.

    Candace, Sean and Tomi fairly participated in presentation of profiles on the Express home page. Clearly, Tomi stepped beyond the creed prejudice of her campaign and democratic club supporters to be “on-message” with the primary concerns of district 2 voters. That is appreciated by many including me and reflects the gracious, intelligent individual I met at coffee a few months back.

    The challenges readers, including me, present to you for your sponsorship of defamation, and your complicity in such authorship, is meant to focus your efforts on journalism that serves your readers instead of serving political subservience. Your sponsorship of Informed Resident(s) and friends on the Town Square Forum has only prospered disrespect for the Express as “the funny papers” among Dolores’ readers, their neighborhoods and their communities.

    Your profiles of district 2 candidates prove you can do much better.

  8. To Informed Resident:

    It’s true that Candace has the endorsement of the DSA – Deputy Sheriffs Association with 770 members and the Deputy District Attorneys Association with 82 members.

    Care to make a guess as to how many of the other county labor unions, that have a total membership of 7700 members, will endorse TeeVeeDeeBee? They know she’s their friend because they know she voted to support Project Labor Agreements which *REQUIRE* the use of unionized labor.

    All of them, mebbe?

  9. @Alamo Ron,

    Pardon me but from what I see Candace is supported and endorsed specifically by 2 of the County’s unions….one of which is in the middle of bargaining their contract and appears to be deadlocked. Think they may be looking for a friend? “Mebbe”?

    I just looked at Tomi’s (Tee Vee Dee Bee as you put it) and I don’t see 7,700 union members lining up under her long list of endorsers as you imply. In fact at a recent debate I heard her pledge not to take any money (support) from County unions. Can Candace say the same? Just a question.

    You know as well as I, that usually Dems are more inclined to be supported by Labor, and in the end these are the same hard working people that many of us call our neighbors. Trying to vilify them is downright offensive.

    I am proud that many of my friends, neighbors and family are union. In most cases they are the people that protect us and improve our quality of life in this county…and believe it or not, they Vote. In the end I don’t blame either candidate for seeking support and endorsement. What I do take issue with is unfairly trying to paint Candace as not wanting or needing that support as much as Tomi.

    While I am not always a fan of PLA’s (project labor agreements), lets be fair-a lot of municipalities use (require) them as they guarantee a level of standards.

    If you want to talk about “experience” dealing with unions, the County, or actual business experience…well like it or not Tomi wins hands down.

  10. Informed Resident brings up an excellent point, namely that organized groups typically perform “Friends of…” contributions under different names. They also form numerous Independent Expenditure (IE) committees such as PACs or other obscurant names.

  11. wh0cd182481 [url=http://cymbalta247.us.org/]cymbalta pills[/url] [url=http://albendazole247.us.org/]albendazole online[/url] [url=http://albendazole24.us.org/]albendazole 400 mg[/url]

Leave a comment