News

Danville Town Council issues formal opposition to Tassajara Parks housing development project

Project would construct 125 homes east of Danville

The Danville Town Council has officially taken a stance in opposition of the 125 single-family home Tassajara Parks housing development project, which is set to be reviewed by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.

125 homes have been proposed to be built in the Tassajara Valley's "Northern Site." (Image courtesy Contra Costa County Planning Commission)

Council members approved the resolution by a 4-1 vote, with members citing the significant policy and environmental issues the town claims the project presents. Councilman Robert Storer was the lone dissenting vote, asking the council to table the discussion.

"This has been a six-year process. It has been one where we have initially been at the table and subsequently we haven't been and that's not through any fault of ours," Town Manager Joe Calabrigo said During the special meeting Tuesday. "The project is ready to move forward to the county planning commission and is being brought to you this evening because staff believes that it's better for the town to take a position before the county does."

"The town for the last few years has raised valid policy and environmental concerns related to the project mainly because town residents stand to be those most directly impacted by the downstream impacts," he added.

Located in unincorporated Contra Costa County just east of Danville, the Tassajara Parks project is composed of two, noncontiguous, areas of land, divided as the “Northern Site” and the “Southern Site.”

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support DanvilleSanRamon.com for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

The northern site proposes a 54-acre development footprint (of the total property's 771 acres) that includes 125 single-family homes, public streets, related grading, a neighborhood park, drainage facilities, staging area and other improvements.

The Project would require a change to the Contra Costa County Urban Limit Line (ULL) to include the 30-acre residential development area in the Northern Site, a move Danville council members vehemently opposed.

"It doesn't give me trust in the people who made that vote for me. I looked at that first and I said if you can make these exceptions (to the ULL), people are going to stop trusting into the system on why we do the things we do," councilwoman Lisa Blackwell said.

Calabrigo further argued that making an exception to the voter-approved ULL would need voter approval.

Town officials also took issue with concerns over the lack of available water that could service the project and new housing development, with the East Bay Municipal Utility District saying there is currently no viable source of water currently exists to serve the proposed project.

The final decision on the project will be made by county officials; however, town staff hope that coming out in direct opposition to the project will help give the town a seat at the table and potentially influence the decision by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.

"Us saying 'no' isn't going to stop the county from doing what they are going to do, but we need to weigh in if we want to have the ability to push it any further," said city attorney Rob Ewing.

In casting the lone dissenting vote, councilman Storer stated that he was not in favor of the project, going so far as to say that it served "no benefit to Danville," but believed that the decision should have been tabled until a future date.

"We could just sit back to see this thing unfold," he said. "If we say no right now, we're not at the table anymore and at some point we may want to be…" he said. "Instead of just saying 'opposed,' why don't we just say neutral or reschedule it? Let's just kick this can down the road a little bit to try and understand from other jurisdictions where we are at with this."

The project was scheduled to be reviewed by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission during its regular meeting on Sept. 30. However, that meeting was canceled and will be rescheduled for consideration sometime in November.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

Follow DanvilleSanRamon.com on Twitter @DanvilleSanRamo, Facebook and on Instagram @ for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Danville Town Council issues formal opposition to Tassajara Parks housing development project

Project would construct 125 homes east of Danville

by / Danville San Ramon

Uploaded: Wed, Oct 21, 2020, 3:55 pm

The Danville Town Council has officially taken a stance in opposition of the 125 single-family home Tassajara Parks housing development project, which is set to be reviewed by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.

Council members approved the resolution by a 4-1 vote, with members citing the significant policy and environmental issues the town claims the project presents. Councilman Robert Storer was the lone dissenting vote, asking the council to table the discussion.

"This has been a six-year process. It has been one where we have initially been at the table and subsequently we haven't been and that's not through any fault of ours," Town Manager Joe Calabrigo said During the special meeting Tuesday. "The project is ready to move forward to the county planning commission and is being brought to you this evening because staff believes that it's better for the town to take a position before the county does."

"The town for the last few years has raised valid policy and environmental concerns related to the project mainly because town residents stand to be those most directly impacted by the downstream impacts," he added.

Located in unincorporated Contra Costa County just east of Danville, the Tassajara Parks project is composed of two, noncontiguous, areas of land, divided as the “Northern Site” and the “Southern Site.”

The northern site proposes a 54-acre development footprint (of the total property's 771 acres) that includes 125 single-family homes, public streets, related grading, a neighborhood park, drainage facilities, staging area and other improvements.

The Project would require a change to the Contra Costa County Urban Limit Line (ULL) to include the 30-acre residential development area in the Northern Site, a move Danville council members vehemently opposed.

"It doesn't give me trust in the people who made that vote for me. I looked at that first and I said if you can make these exceptions (to the ULL), people are going to stop trusting into the system on why we do the things we do," councilwoman Lisa Blackwell said.

Calabrigo further argued that making an exception to the voter-approved ULL would need voter approval.

Town officials also took issue with concerns over the lack of available water that could service the project and new housing development, with the East Bay Municipal Utility District saying there is currently no viable source of water currently exists to serve the proposed project.

The final decision on the project will be made by county officials; however, town staff hope that coming out in direct opposition to the project will help give the town a seat at the table and potentially influence the decision by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.

"Us saying 'no' isn't going to stop the county from doing what they are going to do, but we need to weigh in if we want to have the ability to push it any further," said city attorney Rob Ewing.

In casting the lone dissenting vote, councilman Storer stated that he was not in favor of the project, going so far as to say that it served "no benefit to Danville," but believed that the decision should have been tabled until a future date.

"We could just sit back to see this thing unfold," he said. "If we say no right now, we're not at the table anymore and at some point we may want to be…" he said. "Instead of just saying 'opposed,' why don't we just say neutral or reschedule it? Let's just kick this can down the road a little bit to try and understand from other jurisdictions where we are at with this."

The project was scheduled to be reviewed by the Contra Costa County Planning Commission during its regular meeting on Sept. 30. However, that meeting was canceled and will be rescheduled for consideration sometime in November.

Comments

John
Registered user
Danville
on Oct 22, 2020 at 8:50 am
John, Danville
Registered user
on Oct 22, 2020 at 8:50 am
5 people like this

Was there an Environmental Impact Report filed for the proposed Tassajara Parks housing development in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)? If EBMUD states there are no viable water sources for the project, the project needs to define the mitigation for the significant impact under CEQA due to the lack of water. If it cannot do so in a valid and verifiable manner, the project should not be allowed to proceed. Full Stop. The "six-year" duration of the process is irrelevant.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.