Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Pleasanton voters spoke clearly last election

The election was nine months ago. 

Former city councilmember Valerie Arkin still doesn’t understand what happened. She continues to confuse activity with results. Yes, leading up to the election, the city conducted “city council meetings, special meetings, community workshops, and direct outreach”. As a result, city leadership managed to cut a mere 1% from the budget.

Then the city rolled out a sales tax increase ballot measure supported by four of the five city councilmembers. A city-paid consulting firm poll tested the final version, which was renamed the “Essential Services Protection Act”, and suggested that it would pass with about 58% of the vote. The city also mailed pro-tax increase material to voters.

The city councilmembers said that the voters should decide. And they did. On Nov. 5, Measure PP received 46% of the vote. And Valerie Arkin received 46% of the vote in her reelection bid. She was beaten by Craig Eicher, someone who had never run for public office before.

Since the election, the city has been through a long overdue, thorough review of spending and priorities. In my 35 years as a resident, I have never seen more citizen engagement. There is a new budget. This has been a very good outcome.

— Doug Miller, former chair of the No on Measure PP Campaign

Don’t bury union contracts

Pleasanton Weekly, can you help us better understand why you essentially buried an important topic at the back end of the water rate article? The coming union contracts? This is an extremely important topic that the Pleasanton community needs to become more aware of, and the Pleasanton Weekly plays a critical role with making this happen.

Of course public employees provide vital services to the community and deserve to be fairly compensated for the value they provide. And they have been. However when the total compensation including pensions and lifetime healthcare coverage is considered, Pleasanton has been overcompensating for decades.  

This is why total employee compensation is eating more and more of Pleasanton’s budget and other vital community investments are being starved. And this is the primary reason for the current significant financial deficit we are facing.

Pleasanton’s leadership’s track record on saying no to such unreasonable union asks has been very poor. Like this one where the union once again asking for above baseline inflation raises, knowing full well that their ask is driving Pleasanton into a deeper financial hole.

Pleasanton Weekly’s role with increasing community awareness of such important topics helps drive community engagement and bolsters Pleasanton leadership courage to make the politically challenging decisions which are best for the overall community. Thanks in advance for your increased attention to the critical community role you play.

— Bart Hughes

Stop wasting our time

The reality is that we elected a new mayor, and with the assistance of 2 new councilmembers, replacing councilmember Valerie Arkin and the other incumbent, Pleasanton now has a new and transparent direction.

If our past council had been truly transparent on the budget crisis, then maybe the outcome of our last election would have been different.

Of course former councilmember Arkin would think the Weekly got it all wrong when reporting on the actions of the past council, since she always voted with the majority, unless it made her appear to compromise without changing the outcome. It is comments like those in her opinion piece Aug. 1 titled “Pleasanton Weekly got it wrong” that are misleading when it comes to the facts. There is a reason why she is a former councilmember.

In addition, the council majority voted to put Measure PP on the ballot, and the majority of residents responded with a message loud and clear. No on PP!

To learn from defeat can be a blessing, if you accept the outcome.

And talk about not listening, I agree with Michael Austin in his opinion on Councilmember Jeff Nibert, who is supposed to represent District 1.

I believe both of these opinion pieces I have mentioned, show who has not been listening, and who is still not listening.

It’s time to move on!!

— Debbie Wallace

What is democracy?

Democracy is the majority, the masses, the individual, the bigger tent, the marginalized, DEI, a seat at the table, urban/suburban/rural, the right to food, the right to shelter, the right to feel safe, the right to disagree, the Constitution, awake, radical, truth, an aspiration, an experiment, the past, present, and future, the arts, the sciences, storytelling, family, hope, optimism, respect, agency, a birthright, our shared humanity, an ideal that lives in all of us. 

Democracy is not a political party. Democracy is a way of life. Democracy matters. Democracy is America.

Ward Kanowsky

Pleasanton Weekly got it right

The letter in the Aug. 1 issue of the Weekly is more “sour grapes” and an attempt at revisionist history from previous councilmembers who supported Measure PP. 

Please remember the consultant hired by the city for more than $200,000 conducted a survey of Pleasanton voters and informed the council a tax measure would likely not pass (with an opposition campaign).  

Rather than alter their course, the council majority endorsed a campaign of fear and intimidation to inform the electorate of the many programs and projects that would be eliminated if the sales tax increase was defeated.

Please remember before the November election, I went before the council and argued the decision to place Measure PP on the ballot was most likely the wrong move, politically.  

There were two reasons behind my contention: First, the consultant’s initial survey predicting defeat of a sales tax measure and, second, the well-funded and organized voter opposition to the measure.  

Please remember it’s not revisionist history to point out the two councilmembers now engaging in sour grapes lost their November reelection bids to remain on the council.  

The Weekly should be commended for praising the current council majority decision to apply $3 million in annual interest earnings from the 115 Pension Trust toward the operating budget. The move does not increase our unfunded liability, which is determined by the composition of our workforce and CALPERS assumed and actual investment rates of return.

Agreed, economic development is important. Now with a positive city staff reorganization and a new council majority, Pleasanton will begin to experience positive economic development.

— Arne Olson, former member Pleasanton City Council 

Beware those selling heritage

Heritage is often presented as a proud celebration of the past — a curated narrative that highlights the traditions, achievements, and symbols that a group chooses to elevate and preserve. In many cases, heritage serves as a way to glorify history, emphasizing moments of triumph, cultural identity and continuity while glossing over or omitting more troubling aspects. 

Yet, history itself is rarely so flattering. It contains hard lessons — stories of violence, oppression, exploitation and resistance alongside those of innovation, cooperation, and progress. 

When people invoke “heritage”, it is often because significant parts of history are missing from their narrative. These gaps may be intentional or subconscious, but they create a version of the past that is easier to celebrate than to interrogate. 

In this way, heritage can function not only as a celebration of identity but as a shield against difficult truths. Real engagement with the past requires confronting it in its entirety, not just the parts that affirm who we think we are.

When heritage becomes mythologized, it turns into something even more powerful — and more dangerous. It can seduce people with the promise of belonging, pride, or moral righteousness, all while quietly being used as a tool of influence. 

Curated by those in power, these narratives often appeal to emotion rather than evidence, making people more susceptible to manipulation. In doing so, they ask communities to protect a version of the past that may never have existed, turning heritage into a stage, history into a script, and the public into an audience told not to question — but to believe.

— John Williams

Most Popular

Leave a comment